• Welcome to the new NAXJA Forum! If your password does not work, please use "Forgot your password?" link on the log-in page. Please feel free to reach out to [email protected] if we can provide any assistance.

"Upgrades" you most regret spending money on

buying a tow rig that became a bigger progect then the jeep ever was
 
44 isnt a bad axle...i think a 60 front end is just to big for my rig since it's my only vehicle and I DD it. I rather put money into a 44 then a 30....i dunno maybe thats just me
 
Buying this POS terra-locker:
100_2943.jpg

100_2944.jpg

100_2936.jpg
 
Meh, so far my hp44 has treated me well. I never broke a 260x ujoint on 33s though, I'm usually not a pedal masher offroad.

My buddy never broke a u joint either until he installed a front locker, then within a few weeks he snapped one trying to climb onto the cement part of a light at t-bell. I have replacement 297x shafts that will replace my 260's if they every break.
 
Id take a rubi lp44 over a hp30 anyday
i just dont see the point when you'd have the same weak link, the u joints. i know you can do rcv's or ctm's but then you'd be into it for more than a dana 60 for a weaker axle.
 
buying a Honda Pilot instead of a Grand Cherokee :doh:

and buying a 01 WJ 4.0 for my 00 XJ and not realizing how much drilling and tapping would be necessary to fit it in
 
What all were you breaking on yours?

Ring and pinions.

i dont know, after having done all 3 (polished d30, polished dana 44, and moderately polished dana 60), i think the 44 was the biggest waste of money out of the 3. it broke just as often as the dana 30 but cost more to fix and was heavier.
The dana 60 was the cheapest and strongest of the bunch.

So far the only thing I've broken on the 44 is one hub.

I couldn't keep pinions in the Dana 30 to save my life.

The 30 was built very similar to how the 44 is.

Cover, truss, chromo shafts, super joints... the only difference between the two is the Dana 30 had a lock-rite in the stock carrier and the 44 has a full case Detroit in it.

The 30 held it's own for the most part with the hell it went thru on 35's. I guess I just regret it since I lost a boat load of cash when I sold it. I built the 30 with all brand new parts and built the 44 at a fraction of the price by finding great condition used stuff at good prices.
 
Last edited:
About 6 or 7 motor mount holes, valve cover needs to be shaved down, had to fill ax bracket and re drill......had to get crossover mounts from brown dog that cost more than the engine, but they are the best mod I've ever done

You know, not much:soapbox:
 
i just dont see the point when you'd have the same weak link, the u joints. i know you can do rcv's or ctm's but then you'd be into it for more than a dana 60 for a weaker axle.

Ring and pinions.

So far the only thing I've broken on the 44 is one hub.

I couldn't keep pinions in the Dana 30 to save my life.

This, among other things.

It's comical to me how people argue that the problem with the D44 is the u-joint, which makes it as weak as a D30. Most u-joint failures occur because the caps start to spin off. If you get Spicer non-greasable u-joints and weld the caps you eliminate this problem. The u-joint will still break, but much, much later - most likely the hub will go first. To me this argument is the same as saying that if you go to a D60 that's not a king-pin then it's no stronger than a D44 because it has ball joints... :rolleyes:

What's stronger about an older D44 vs a D30 is just the tubes, center section, shafts, inner C's, knuckles, ring and pinion, brakes and hubs... Even if you get RCV shafts in a D30 and an ARB, you can still get so much gear deflection that if you don't shred your gears you will eventually walk the bolts out of the ARB and they will grenade your gears. Google it.

An older D44 (Waggy/FSJ/70s-80s truck) with gears, locker and welded u-joint caps is flat out stronger than a D30 with the same setup. Obviously not as strong as a D60 with the same setup (even a ball joint 60) but that maybe overkill for many.

Just sayin'
 
i just dont see the point when you'd have the same weak link, the u joints. i know you can do rcv's or ctm's but then you'd be into it for more than a dana 60 for a weaker axle.
sez the guy who took a dana 44 and put dana 30 outers on it :wow:

how did the same weak link do with that setup :spin1:

(it's my weak link too, but I run stock auto gearing in my 30 so at most a new one costs $130 at the junkyard, and comes with $60 in spare shafts and $20 in spare steering)
 
i just dont see the point when you'd have the same weak link, the u joints. i know you can do rcv's or ctm's but then you'd be into it for more than a dana 60 for a weaker axle.
spicer 760's and full circle clips, seen many blown up D30 r&p's of various gear ratios with that setup, so whats the weak link again
 
Back
Top