- Location
- Wasatch Range
Correction, education should be non-partisan. Teach facts, not opinions or political agendas
I think it is my business, because I'm of the mind education should be bi-partisan. I understand she stated her comments were personal, but she also stated that she's a teacher. She's an educated individual; therefore, it's hard for me to accept her naivety. Constitution or not, certain careers come with limits to one's ability to share their personal thoughts with the public.
My apologies. That's what I meant. Heck, we're in agreement for once.Correction, education should be non-partisan. Teach facts, not opinions or political agendas
I don't think I am THAT naive, but thanks for your opinion.Like I said, the only limitations to her opinions are the ones provided to her by her employer. You're the niave one if you think it works like the USSR.
I raised my right hand to support and defend the constitution.
That includes everyone's opinion, not just the ones I choose to agree with. I
Feel free to let me know where exactly the first states it protects one's employment in a position of power over a group they despise.
Then you don't understand the oath you took, or what it entails. Scroll up and read what has been said about the First Amendment that you swore to protect. It doesn't allow everyone to say what they want, when they want or where they want. It guarantees that the government cannot suppress your speech.
My favorite analogy is this: you cannot walk into a movie theater and yell "FIRE" and think that you are protected by the. First Amendment. It doesn't work like that.
Go read the constitution, or pick up a Constitution for Dummies book if need be, then come back and admit you were wrong.
I'm not a constitutional scholar. If you are, good on you. I'm on a message board of a silly little jeep club telling you guys that you're making a mountain out of a mole hill. Nobody in the military cares what that lady said and you shouldn't either.
Nobody in the military cares what that lady said and you shouldn't either.
The problem is an open bigot is in a position that determines the success or failure of the people she hates.
People that are retarded enough to be bigots should not be in those positions. It is fully within the rights of the employer to terminate her employment and within the rights of the consumer to demand it.
I think it's funny that you confuse the laws enacted by congress with the amendments to the constitution.
I'm not a constitutional scholar.
though I may smile a little when fred kicks the bucket.