5-90
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Hammerspace
Indiana Air Guard got called up for Katrina as well - mom's new husband got a Katrina ribbon for the few months he was down there as well.
And since when does a city problem call for a national response anyhow?
I'll leave alone the asininity of building a city below sea level - yeah, Holland built a whole country down there, but they haven't been flooded out in recent memory, they've done a good job with their dikes, the windmills are probably still pumping away, and the Atlantic doesn't move.
The Mississippi changes course every, what, 75 years or so? Building against the river north of there doesn't make any sense, building in the actual delta is even dumber.
New Orleans has about as much "right to exist" as Los Angeles - just because there are millions of people there doesn't mean it makes any damned sense (LA is about eighteen hours away from breakdown, rioting, and starvation at any given time - from interrupting supply lines for either food or water. Leaving aside possible "racial tensions" - cf. Rodney King or the Watts riots...)
"What is Right is not always Popular, what is Popular is not always Right." Again, just because there are millions of people there doesn't mean the city makes any damned sense (and we'll leave aside my "we need fewer people, not more housing" argument for a later date and a separate thread. The world is probably two months from starvation at this point, simply due to population pressures...)
Vote for Obama? I'll probably do what I've been doing for years - write in for Roy Henry Boehm and James Dennis Watson III (either order - I don't care, and neither do they. I've corresponded with both men on and off for a few years - they're flattered, and they don't care what order I write them down in either.) It makes more sense than voting for Al Bundy and Dan Fielding - at least my vote gets counted somewhere, since it's for actual living people (Google them if you want to know more...)
Yes, I voted for Bush - both of them. Not because I felt either was "the best man for the job," but because I felt that each was "the best man available for the job" given the choices. If I don't like any candidates, then I'll vote Boehm & Watson.
And since when does a city problem call for a national response anyhow?
I'll leave alone the asininity of building a city below sea level - yeah, Holland built a whole country down there, but they haven't been flooded out in recent memory, they've done a good job with their dikes, the windmills are probably still pumping away, and the Atlantic doesn't move.
The Mississippi changes course every, what, 75 years or so? Building against the river north of there doesn't make any sense, building in the actual delta is even dumber.
New Orleans has about as much "right to exist" as Los Angeles - just because there are millions of people there doesn't mean it makes any damned sense (LA is about eighteen hours away from breakdown, rioting, and starvation at any given time - from interrupting supply lines for either food or water. Leaving aside possible "racial tensions" - cf. Rodney King or the Watts riots...)
"What is Right is not always Popular, what is Popular is not always Right." Again, just because there are millions of people there doesn't mean the city makes any damned sense (and we'll leave aside my "we need fewer people, not more housing" argument for a later date and a separate thread. The world is probably two months from starvation at this point, simply due to population pressures...)
Vote for Obama? I'll probably do what I've been doing for years - write in for Roy Henry Boehm and James Dennis Watson III (either order - I don't care, and neither do they. I've corresponded with both men on and off for a few years - they're flattered, and they don't care what order I write them down in either.) It makes more sense than voting for Al Bundy and Dan Fielding - at least my vote gets counted somewhere, since it's for actual living people (Google them if you want to know more...)
Yes, I voted for Bush - both of them. Not because I felt either was "the best man for the job," but because I felt that each was "the best man available for the job" given the choices. If I don't like any candidates, then I'll vote Boehm & Watson.