5-90
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Hammerspace
ok first yes I am union (elevator const loc 25)
1 what trade are you in
2 why do you not fault the lawyers
3 why do you not fault the companies subing work out to chinese
4 the toyota workers benefit from the standards set buy the unions years ago
5 why does everyone assume without unions all shops would continue to give workers a fair wage
I do agree with you - former union myself (Teamsters) and plenty of union in the family (Carpenters, IBEW, Plumbers & Steamfitters, Steelworkers, ...)
It's not strictly the fault of the union membership (in case I didn't make that point clear before,) but of union management taking itself too seriously; of attorneys making things more difficult than they have to be; of accountants making decisions in fields in which they are not qualified (engineering, maintenance, management, personnel, ...); corporate greed (offshore labour being cheaper, and not having standards to adhere to. I wonder how long it will be before the Pacific Rim finally starts to organise?); and the like.
Unions, in a logical world, should not be as important as they have become or have made themselves out to be. But they are. I'm not arguing (for the record) that all legal workers have benefit from prior organisation of labour around the turn of the century, and (properly used) unions can serve to keep employers honest. I've no trouble with that.
I've no trouble with unions negotiating contracts between labour and management - I've been on the union side of the table a couple of times myself.
The problem is, as I have stated, that unions end up taking far too much each time. Yes, it sets a useful precedent to make sure that management cedes something each time, and if the union cedes something in exchange then balance is maintained. But, quite a few unions think that "give and take" means "you give and we take" - and that's the problem.
It don't work that way. Not on a sustainable basis. Hell, we have only to look at the housing bubble and the current economic crisis to see that (and the government's best course, in this case, is to get out of the way and do nothing. We're borrowing against the future to try to save the now, which just saddles our children with much more debt. We're borrowing already to pay the interest on what we've borrowed before!
I think it was in another thread where I saw someone saying "Despite repeated whacks to the head, the patient failed to regain consciousness." More true than we know - and in many more situations than we think.