stoneattic
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Honey Brook, PA
Also less rim protection.
Not if you run the correct width wheel.
Also less rim protection.
Do you think 33x10.5 would work well on a 3 inch lift with aggressive cutting? What kind of backspacing would be best? I need new tires too and I like the idea of a narrow tire, except for sand of course.
Do you think 33x10.5 would work well on a 3 inch lift with aggressive cutting? What kind of backspacing would be best? I need new tires too and I like the idea of a narrow tire, except for sand of course.
<--- what!!!!Also less rim protection.
what about 35x10.5? I've only been able to find 1 tire of this size (interco SSRs), would a 35x10.5 SSR be better than a 33x10.5 KM2 (or other similar MT)?
Is your 8.8 from an Explorer? Is it narrower than a stock Jeep XJ axle or wider? A friend and I are in an ongoing argument, I say it's narrower because that's what I read somewhere, he says it's wider.Hate to add fuel to the fire...so to speak, but, I'm running an '89 with minor trimming, 3" of lift, and 33x10.5's on 15x7 rims with 4" backspacing. I only had to change the backspacing from stock when I installed my Ford 8.8 in the rear (had clearance issues with leaf springs). I love the 10.5's...tuck under nicely, handle well on the highway (BFG AT's), and work well in the winter snow/ice (love the NP242 for that).
Here in Montana, we wheel a lot of rocks (sharp, cutting kind), snow (love the spring/summer mountain snow pack), and a little mud. I keep up with the big boys...and I think the ATs work better in the snow than the MT's.
Just my $0.02
its narrower
Thanks.Oh, and the 8.8 is narrower. I have spacers on the rear to match the width of my stock front 30
I notice the 33x10.50 BFG KM2s are hard to find or out of stock online. Has anyone found a set recently?