I kindof agree. I see and hear chili con carne and understand that as "chili with meat" so therefore plain chili is w/o meat. So does that mean traditionally chili has no meat? Or what is a traditional chili? In my opinion the beef to beans ratio should be dependent on the use. If it's a stand alone meal/snack/topping: beans are OK. If it's a meal on its own it should be fewer beans and more meats.
I figure meat to beans should be about 50/50 by weight, and that's what it usually works out to (more or less) for me.
I'm not sure whether I prefer crumbled hamburder or finely cubed steak for the beef bit tho - both have their merits. Crumble the sausage (or slice it relatively thin - say, 1/8"-1/4" from the links - or so) and bacon; well, bacon improves anything with meat in it. Look it up - I think bacon is first on the Periodic Table of Awesome. Therefore, bacon is the basic building block of awesome (just as hydrogen is the basic building block of the Universe.)
My younger son is out camping with his new g/f and her family this week-end - I had to remind him that bacon has to be available in the provisions
and eaten with at least one meal while camping, per Federal law (or, at least, Man Laws.)
But, "beans only" chili (or worse - "vegetarian chili!") is for wussies that just can't handle real food. "Vegetables are what food eats." I owe my physique to a strict diet of vegetarians...
"I'm feeling nauseous and I have a headache. I think that vegetable soup we had for lunch had
beef broth in it."
"Your body's kickin' back ...
broth? You're a manly man, aren't you?"