Noobs! (to court, that is...)
Take it from an old timer who has tried many, many, many times to fight tickets. This is not going to work. But I know what will...
Here's what would happen if you tried to bring in pictures of the intersection and spout of facts a figures:
===
The judge (and prosecuting attorney) will question your qualifications for knowing such facts as stopping distance, reaction time, and distance traveled per second. Trust me - you’d be better off pounding your head with a tire-iron.
The officer will "forget" facts like how far you were away from the intersection, how fast you were going, etc. etc. and just say that it was his opinion that you could of have stopped.
That is GOLD to the judge. It's all he has to hear. The judge will say that the officer is a trained professional and knows what he's doing.
You will be called a liar - because of course, you have no credibility, and will be sent packing with a bill to pay and points against your license.
===
The ONLY way to fight this is with an attorney - PLEASE, PLEASE trust me. It doesn't go well for 99% of people who try to fight tickets.
If the judge knows there's a defense attorney, quite often the ticket will be just thrown out - very few, or no questions asked.
If they want to fight it, the attorney should hire an accident reconstruction specialist. The court will recognize that they are QUALIFIED to spout off facts and figures like how many feet per second you are traveling at any given speed. How rain affects stopping speed, etc.
The court WILL NOT accept anything you have to say as qualified information.
===
"But an attorney costs too much..."
OH WELL...
Don't say I didn't warn you...