Mike ...there is a decay rate. The incremental or decremental aspect of it can only manifest itself in length of service. Think about it.
If you admit that zddp is sacrificial ...(enough evidence for anyone to accept) ..then there is a point where there is less of it (in its usable form = there's no "uptake" of the fundamental zinc and phos = they do, however, volatilize). That sensibly leads most to reason that a 1200 ppm starting point ....or a 900 ppm starting point are GOING to resemble each other in effective worth AT SOME POINT in the OCI.
We then would sensibly reason that it's down to a matter of length of OCI that will determine your TRUE level of viable zddp in the oil. Naturally, if you start with more ...you'll end with more ...but you'll be dealing with "less" of it from the first time you bump the key ..and every revolution after that until you drain it out.
Go ahead and put both levels (900/1200) on any decay curve that you want. Use exponential if you want. Now plot that over a given mileage (make it up) ..there IS - by any reasonable analysis, going to be somewhere on the graph where the lines occupy the exact same coordinates on one plane. They will occupy it at different "times" (mileages) ..but THEY WILL BE AT THE SAME LEVELS IN CONCENTRATION.
I'm saying that you're (typically) draining your oil before EITHER of those levels are damaging to your engine. If you're a 3k/3m prisoner ...you've (most likely) got more active zddp than someone running SL out to a sensible OCI.
If you can throw a bucket of water on that notion ..I'll end my contributions to this minor matter (imo). I have enjoyed, and do admire, your apparent ability to find only that which tends to support this notion and your complete rejection of offered, anxiety easing, information. A tip of the hat to you, sir
Cheers