red91
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- exact location unknown
cal said:Yes, but it makes me feel so good to type it. Its like masterbation without the mess.
He reminds me of Al Franken.
:confused1
cal said:Yes, but it makes me feel so good to type it. Its like masterbation without the mess.
Thanks for the new sig Cal.cal said:Yes, but it makes me feel so good to type it. Its like masterbation without the mess.
DrMoab said:Thanks for the new sig Cal.
cal said:If I had a nickle for every time someone quoted me in a forum signature..
My last one was in bold. I just cut and pasted the body of the sig. Didn't think about it turning out that way.cal said:If I had a nickle for every time someone quoted me in a forum signature..
Although, I find it mildly creepy that you used bold print.
GSequoia said:You'd be able to buy a shiny new dime?
cal said:I mean shit howdy, with a dime I could buy enough gas to move my jeep from the back lot into the driveway.
GSequoia said:I trust then it's at about a 30° downgrade?
Ray H said:Whats the biggest monitary expense of the war in the middleast? Anyone know?
I dont think the war is as expensive as the number make it out to be.
Most of the troops over there would be over here if they werent there. We would still be paying them, feeding them and training them. Anyone who has been in the military knows it doesnt just shut down and go wait in a closet for war. there are huge expenses paid on a daily basis to keep our troops on payroll and to keep their training up to date.
I have to laugh whenever I see huge numbers thrown out there (and people that actually believe them) because after 8 years in the military I can tell you, its not free to have a standing military. My relatively educated guess is you can cut whatever number is fed to you by the media by about 2/3rds and come up with an accurate price tag for the war.
Oh yeah, fat chance the media or democrats are taking the cost of a standing military into consideration when they throw those numbers out there.
scottmcneal said:[FONT=Tahoma, sans-serif]A president's pension currently is $191,300 per year, until he is 80 years old.[/FONT]
[FONT=Tahoma, sans-serif]Assuming the next president lives to age 80, Sen. McCain would receive ZERO pension as he would reach 80 at the end of two terms as president. Sen. Obama would be retired for 26 years after two terms and would receive $4,973,800 in pension.[/FONT]
[FONT=Tahoma, sans-serif]Therefore it would certainly make economic sense to elect McCain in November.[/FONT]
[FONT=Tahoma, sans-serif]Now that's a non-partisan way to make a decision, isn't it???[/FONT]
[FONT=Tahoma, sans-serif]Now this isn't being rude is it?[/FONT]
JNickel101 said:My guess would be all the civilian contractors....