Yah, posting a link to a story that you have to pay to view should piss someone off.
I had a link from an email, but I think I deleted the original link. Here is a version of the same story on Fidelity at:
https://news.fidelity.com/news/news...COMBINED_WEN7647_1&cat=Top.Investing.RT&IMG=Y
The original one I was trying to post said Citibank was holding out for 65% cash plus a big slice of Chrysler stock plus a position on the board of directors. Some of this leaked stuff, not first hand.
Here is the part of the text I was originally trying to link to:
"The Treasury now proposes that the banks and other lenders accept as payment 22% of the $6.9 billion they are owed plus a 5% equity stake in Chrysler, said several people familiar with the matter. That's up from an earlier Treasury proposal that the banks and other lenders accept 15% of what Chrysler owes them and receive no Chrysler stock.
The lenders, which include
Citigroup Inc. and
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., rejected that offer outright and instead proposed Monday they get paid about 65% of the debt, or about $4.5 billion. In addition, the lenders sought a 40% Chrysler stake and a seat on the company's board, according to a copy of the proposal provided by individuals outside the lenders' group.
The new government offer leaves the U.S. and Chrysler lenders at least $3 billion apart with one week left before an April 30 Treasury deadline to determine the auto maker's fate. The two sides are also far apart in how big an ownership stake the lenders would get in a restructured Chrysler."