That US Army Officer's account of Obama, yeah well he was lying. . ..

[Darky]

Yeah obama sucks, socialism sucks, but, enough with the osama references, you just come off as in ignorant redneck when you "slip up" and say that.

And this from an ignorant redneck!!

 

[hitchhiker]

Either choice is better then the last 8 years.

 

[IndyXJ]

Its just Obama trying to ease into a one world gov't where nation-states have no meaning...jk, or am I

Obama and Hillary were in VA the same time Bilderberg met this year...:skull1: :skull2:

 

[ZomBrady]

Its just Obama trying to ease into a one world gov't where nation-states have no meaning...jk, or am I

Dude, it was Bush the Elder that pushed for the 'New World Order'. . . .

 

[tbburg]

Damien666: Either choice is better then Carter,... well, maybe not.

Fixed it for you.

 

[ZomBrady]

Damien666: Either choice is better then Carter,... well, maybe not.

Fixed it for you.

Carter worse than Bush the Slow of Mind? You are kidding, right? I know legally retarded people that would have made better presidents than that pickled cokehead.

 

[Ramsey]

And this from an ignorant redneck!!

I know, its that bad.

 

[tbburg]

Sbrad001: Were you talking about Clinton?:roflmao:

 

[WrenchMonkey]

Obama's speech was often vague, sometimes banal and more reminiscent of John Lennon's feel good song 'Imagine' than of a foreign policy agenda."

That about sums it up right there...

Robert

 

[JNickel101]

Just once....I want to see Obama make a speech without using the word "change" and without a teleprompter.

Brady, I don't quite understand your insidious hatred for the Bush family. I know you're a smart man and realize that we're not a dictatorship. I also know you served in the Marines (and by my simple math, you served under Clinton - who as you know, used the military more than Bush has, and also cut the defense budget more than any president in US history). Everyone wants to blame gas prices and every other problem in this country on Bush....do you really believe everything you read in the liberal media?

Before you say anything...

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=301702713742569

now tell me who the media favors?

 

[ZomBrady]

Just once....I want to see Obama make a speech without using the word "change" and without a teleprompter.

Brady, I don't quite understand your insidious hatred for the Bush family. I know you're a smart man and realize that we're not a dictatorship. I also know you served in the Marines (and by my simple math, you served under Clinton - who as you know, used the military more than Bush has, and also cut the defense budget more than any president in US history). Everyone wants to blame gas prices and every other problem in this country on Bush....do you really believe everything you read in the liberal media?

Before you say anything...

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=301702713742569

now tell me who the media favors?

There's no question in my mind who the media is giving more attention too, but that doesn't mean that he's going to win.

Bush is the f**ktard who cost my niece her husband. There was no need or justification to invade Iraq. It took resources away from the real war in Afghanistan and the hunt for Bin Laden. And it's cost thousands of US lives and hundreds of thousands Iraqi lives who in many cases don't want us there. So why did my nieces husband die? For some shithead that didn't want him there in the first place or some shithead president that wanted to leave a legacy behind him?

My niece's husband was following orders, I'm cool with that, but I'm a civilian now and I can be outraged and pissed at that idiot president of ours who cost him his life.

F**k Bush.

 

[JNickel101]

I can understand that, and I'm sorry for your personal loss - but you should also be mad at every member of Congress who supported the invasion - be mad at Rumsfeld, all of the Generals, the intelligence agencies that provided the bad (or lack of) intelligence....the list goes on and on my friend. Even Clinton agreed (in 2003) that Saddam needed to be removed from power. It wasnt a one-sided, one man decision. It was a collective decision by MANY asshats.

I'm not saying Bush is a great President. I will support him, as well as support any Commander-in-Chief. But there is plenty of blame to pass around equally. It does NOT fall squarely on the shoulders of one person.

 

[ZomBrady]

I can understand that, and I'm sorry for your personal loss - but you should also be mad at every member of Congress who supported the invasion - be mad at Rumsfeld, all of the Generals, the intelligence agencies that provided the bad (or lack of) intelligence....the list goes on and on my friend. Even Clinton agreed (in 2003) that Saddam needed to be removed from power. It wasnt a one-sided, one man decision. It was a collective decision by MANY asshats.

I'm not saying Bush is a great President. I will support him, as well as support any Commander-in-Chief. But there is plenty of blame to pass around equally. It does NOT fall squarely on the shoulders of one person.

Trust me, I hold a special place for each of those f**ktards, but I think the vast majority of blame lies at the Bush Administration for using faulty intel that they knew was faulty.

I believe 100% that Bush and his cronies were simply looking for an excuse to invade Iraq.

 

[8Mud]

Trust me, I hold a special place for each of those f**ktards, but I think the vast majority of blame lies at the Bush Administration for using faulty intel that they knew was faulty.

I believe 100% that Bush and his cronies were simply looking for an excuse to invade Iraq.

You really have to expand your view, look at a map and see where the US is deployed. It's almost a perfect circle around Iran.
Would you expect a military commander to share his planning with the media` Would you expect an administration to signal it's true intent, in the media.
Misinformation has always been a part of war. Political or military.
You can almost bet, no matter who becomes president, the pressure on Iran will continue.
Iran is a Fascist regime on the march. Their agenda has morphed some country to country but the goals remain the same. An Islamic world.

We had more of a legitimate reason to invade Iraq than we did to bomb Serbia. First off, Serbia was a civil war and a European problem, in no way an American problem. Clinton hoped to curry favor with the Saudis and get them to pay for the expired ammo they used to fight the war.

IMO we had more of a legitimate reason to be in Iraq than Viet Nam or Serbia.

IMO Saddam would have been a fool if he didn't stockpile chemical weapons. The whole story has yet to be told. How hard would it be to hide a dozen containers in a country the size of Iraq. Heck they haven't found Fosset or his plane yet in an area a whole lot smaller and likely above ground someplace.
More likely the chemical weapons were destroyed and it was hushed up. I can think of many reasons for this. There is still a lot of stuff yet to be revealed about this war or even the Vietnam war.

 

[FordGuy]

IMO Saddam would have been a fool if he didn't stockpile chemical weapons. The whole story has yet to be told. How hard would it be to hide a dozen containers in a country the size of Iraq. Heck they haven't found Fosset or his plane yet in an area a whole lot smaller and likely above ground someplace.
More likely the chemical weapons were destroyed and it was hushed up. I can think of many reasons for this. There is still a lot of stuff yet to be revealed about this war or even the Vietnam war.

You a totally right about this statement

 

[Trail-Axe]

-X2

 

[GSequoia]

... cut the defense budget more than any president in US history.

But why on earth would we keep the military budget at cold war era arms race over inflated levels?