5-90
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Hammerspace
I never said it was efficient, I said that 9mm was cheaper for me to use because, at the time, I went though 100 to 150 rounds a week.
Jon, I agree with most of what you are saying about training except this important missing peice of common sense; Most home owners, unless they are also involved in a criminal enterprise, will almost never need to use their gun for home defense. You shoot to protect people, not property.
When I recomended training, the training I was thinking of, covers more of what basic Police pistol skills and the legal aspects of using a gun in a home defense scenerio.
Point.
However, I didn't mean the "so damned efficient" to be directed at you - more at the community in general (I find the 9m/m - of whatever sort - to be only borderline useful at best for anything sturdier than corrugated cardboard. Whatever NATO thinks of the thing.)
And while the legal aspects/consequences of the use of lethal force should be covered (and typically are in a CCW course, since state laws differ,) and basic sidearm skills (police or military) are a good thing - the simple fact remains that once you are involved in a situation where the likelihood of use of lethal force approaches certainty, the stress upon the person will be incredible. Especially if it's a citizen protecting people - chances are, he's going to be protecting someone close to him. This will present an immense psychological stress on him - and there's no two ways about it.
You can't really simulate the specific psychological stress in training, but it can be approximated with physiological stress - and you should experience that at least once so you have some idea of what to expect. If you plan to carry on a daily basis (or a reasonable approximation,) then training with stress should always be done - else, at least once in a while so you know how you're going to react.
If you're planning on - someday - shooting something more threatening than a "good guy/bad guy" paper target, you have a responsibility to the people around to you to make sure you are as prepared as possible to do so effectively - and do your level damndest to present a threat only toward the threat perceived. Prosecution for a "stray round" injury is likely to be every bit as agressive as prosecution for an intentional and unjustifiable shooting - like anything else, it comes down to a matter of risk management. The greater the risk that is proposed, the greater the responsibility becomes to mitigate that risk. Don't plan on eliminating it entirely - but the closer you can get those odds to zero - and demonstrate that you are making every effort to do so - the better your chances will be in court after the shooting.