93XJ-79CJ said:
Here is the link
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/6.12/murder.html
maybe these kids can learn from eachother..
Wow! Ten pages of BS there...
Cliffs' Notes/talking points:
*Thief A, abetted by Thief B, (coincidentally being Thief A's mother) try to scam Thief C using the classic "bait and switch" tactic.
*After a period of reflection, Thief C ships Thief A a device of moderate brisance, with an apparant intent of disintegrating Thief A.
*Thief B, being proximital to Thief A's intended disintegration, becomes what is known as "collateral damage" or in this case, a "bonus." Thief B, however, is only partially disintegrated by the detonation.
*Thief C created said device using commonly available household materials, however Thief C was either too frugal or sufficiently obtuse to disencumber himself of the remaining incriminating materials. This oversight led to his conviction on charges which earn him a life sentence in prison.
The real victims in the case above seem to be the taxpayers who have been supporting Thief C's long-term incarceration, as well as those supporting Thief A and B's disability payments both prior to and after the detonation. Among the secondary victims is the proprietor of the business from where Thief C illicitly obtained the goods which enabled the whole incident to evolve.
Is there a moral to the story that we can sit our grandkids on our knees and share with them? I see four glaring ones: 1. Don't crap where you eat. 2. It really IS a small world. 3. What goes around, comes around. 4. Shoot, Shovel, and Shut Up.
I don't know about the rest of you, but I place thieves on a lower rung on the societal ladder than murdererers... As a victim of grand theft who has yet to see justice served, I've been often quoted as saying "A faster way to kill the (insert expletive in plural) would take too (insert descriptive expletive) long..." and nothing in my life experiences has yet changed my thoughts on that subject.
Discussion?