Beezil said:
greg......FYI.
and maybe you know this already.
first hand experience while trying to find adequate structure during the 4-link project has shown the trans/driveshaft tunnel to be terrible WEAK!
since you won't be able to send energy through the tubes into the tunnel area to be absorbed by anything else, do not rely on that point to provide any strength/energy absorbtion what-so-ever.
I suggest that you reconsider terminating those tubes in those locations.
good luck with the project
Beez,
Good input. I didn't know it was that weak and had assumed because of the stamped curvature that it would actualy be pretty strong.
What is not there yet though is my mounting base for those pillars. I am going to form some 1/8" stock over the hump that those pillar base flanges will actualy bolt to. The formed stock will also be bolted through the floor pan and should give a total square mounting area of about 100" (5"x20").
Thoughts?
I obviously can't maintain the openess the Chevrons afford and terminate them at the frame; unless I severely tighten up the angle to the point where they probably wouldn't even provide much lateral.
I have got a tranny cross member under there somewhere though............
Ash,
I think the photo is giving a little optical illusion. The rear portion of the halo does not turn in (and down) untill after the B pillar intersection. The front halo bends are an even 90. It's the same width at the Bs as the width over the windshield frame.
The lower As are bolted on to make it easier to remove and also since the exterior parts of the cage usually take more rock abuse, this makes them easier to remove and replace.
I'll also have some similar runners coming from the rear of the rocker up to mid point on the Bs just for body protection and some more from the Ds to the rear bumper to protect the tailights.
and uhh, no powder coated metalic red, I'll be lucky if I can just keep it "metalic" for the next few months.