Jeeper Eric said:
Why do AAL's give such a bad ride? I'm not sure I understand.
Thanks
There are two types of AAL -- long (or full-length) and short (half-legth). Half-length AALs are typically used to lift the vehicle, and because they are short they are also thick, which makes them stiff. Full-length AALs tend to be thinner and flex better.
For your purpose, using another pair of XJ main leaves with the eyes (end loops) cut off is the very best way to go. The Rancho full-length AAL is almost the full length of the XJ main leaf, and it is rated to provide 2" to 2-1/2" of lift. It has more arch than the XJ springs. It's a good AAL, and it rides okay, but it generates more lift than what you want or need.
The XJ main leaf, as described in the Rock Lizard write-up, starts out with the same arch as your springs. So there is no settling, and no more lift than what the increased spring rate will provide. Although his write-up says he got more than 2" of lift, nobody I know of has gotten that much. One of the guys in the North Atlantic chapter gained 1-1/2" on a 2000 XJ, and I gained 1-1/4" on an '88 (which was sagged 1/2" before I started, so I netted only 3/4" higher than stock). The ride quality using an extra pair of XJ main leaves is excellent. The one I did I drove from CT to Montana right after it was finished, and it road very comfortably.
It's a great way to go, not expensive, and it eliminates all the problems of dealing with rusted bolts holding in the spring packs. And, because it is a truly full-length AAL, it also reinforces the full length of your existing main leaf. I don't think the rust on your springs is a problem (it's likely just surface rust), but if the main leaves are weakened at all, this will support the weak areas.