tbburg
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Scottsdale AZ
Yaa! Now we get the spectacle of the chief of the Criminal Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Arizona taking the fifth,..
His story seems to be, "I jus did wut tey tol' me."
But he can't seem to say that under oath.
An entertaining reaction from Rep. Issa, via Hot Air:
His story seems to be, "I jus did wut tey tol' me."
But he can't seem to say that under oath.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ot-answer-questions-on-furious/#ixzz1k3Q5EOKAThe chief of the Criminal Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Arizona is refusing to testify before Congress regarding Operation Fast and Furious,..
Patrick J. Cunningham informed the House Oversight Committee late Thursday through his attorney that he will use the Fifth Amendment protection.
Cunningham was ordered Wednesday to appear before Chairman Darrell Issa and the House Oversight Committee regarding his role in the operation that sent more than 2,000 guns to the Sinaloa Cartel. Guns from the failed operation were found at the murder scene of Border Agent Brian Terry.
The letter,.. .., stunned congressional staff. Last week, Cunningham, the second highest ranking U.S. Attorney in Arizona, was scheduled to appear before Issa‘s committee voluntarily. Then, he declined and Issa issued a subpoena.
"To avoid needless preparation by the Committee and its staff for a deposition next week, I am writing to advise you that my client is going to assert his constitutional privilege not to be compelled to be a witness against himself." Romero(Cunningham’s attorney) told Issa.
An entertaining reaction from Rep. Issa, via Hot Air:
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/20/doj-figure-taking-the-5th-in-fast-furious-probe/“The assertion of the fifth amendment by a senior Justice official is a significant indictment of the Department’s integrity in Operation Fast and Furious. The former head of the ATF has previously told the committee that the Justice Department is managing its response to Operation Fast and Furious in a manner designed to protect its political appointees. This is the first time anyone has asserted their fifth amendment right in this investigation and heightens concerns that the Justice Department’s motivation for refusing to hand over subpoenaed materials is a desire to shield responsible officials from criminal charges and other embarrassment.
“Coming a year after revelations about reckless conduct in Operation Fast and Furious were first brought to light, the assertion of the fifth amendment also raises questions about whether President Obama and Attorney General Holder have made a serious and adequate response to allegations raised by whistleblowers. Did Attorney General Holder really not know a senior Justice Department official fears criminal prosecution or is this just another example of him hiding important facts? The committee will continue to demand answers.”