• Welcome to the new NAXJA Forum! If your password does not work, please use "Forgot your password?" link on the log-in page. Please feel free to reach out to [email protected] if we can provide any assistance.

Navy prefers Johnson Valley for Marine base growth

lobsterdmb

Just a Lobster Minion
NAXJA Member
Navy prefers Johnson Valley for Marine base growth

By Kurt Schauppner Twentynine Palms Correspondent
Hi-Desert Storm
Friday, July 27, 2012


MCAGCC — The final environmental statement for a proposed expansion of the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center suggests growing the installation by about 146,667 acres to the west and 21,304 acres to the south.

If approved, the plan would close 57 percent of the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Area to the public.

The alternative also foresees damage to the local desert tortoise population.

The intent of the preferred alternative, according to the Department of the Navy report, is to allow the Marines to train on a large scale while providing restricted public access to a portion of the acquired public lands in Johnson Valley.

It allows for two Marine Expeditionary Brigade training exercises, lasting 24 days each, every year.

The 146,667 acres of Johnson Valley property included in the proposed expansion would be divided into two sections.

The larger section, 108,530 acres, would be exclusively for military use. Marine expeditionary brigades would use the land for exercises and live-fire training. In some cases, they would use ordnance with explosive charges.

The smaller section, 38,137 acres, would be open for restricted public access when training is not taking place. During exercise periods, about 60 days a year, the section would be closed to public use.

Only weaponry that does not have an explosive charge would be used in this area.

Two locations within the restricted public access area, each measuring 984 feet by 984 feet, would be permanently closed to the public year-round.

The Navy document notes this plan would cause significant impacts to land use, recreation and air space that can’t be mitigated.

The military’s training program is not compatible with the federal government’s Johnson Valley OHV Area Management Plan, the environmental statement acknowledges.

Training activities also could cause the deaths of between 645 and 3,769 desert tortoises over the life of the project; between 503 and 834 of those would be in the acquisition study areas, the report noted.

It called the deaths of the tortoises, a species designated as threatened by the federal government, “significant and unmitigatable.”

Johnson Valley residents fire back

The Homestead Valley Community Council sent packages with protest letters to 19 federal legislators opposing the Marine base expansion into Johnson Valley.

“Two months for air-ground combat, 10 months for public access not workable,” is the headline on a news release the council issued about its campaign.

The council is a group representing the community associations in Johnson Valley, Landers, Yucca Mesa and Flamingo Heights.

“We think shared use of Johnson Valley between the military and the public is doomed to end in the closure of this immense land to public use, due to the very size of it and cost of managing it,” the letter reads.

San Bernardino County Supervisors Neil Derry and Brad Mitzelfelt wrote their own letter urging the Navy to expand the base eastward, into the Wonder Valley area, rather than in Johnson Valley.

The Homestead Community Council asks legislators to urge the Navy to follow the board’s recommendation: “Please heed Supervisors Mitzelfelt and Derry where they urge base expansion to the east, not into Johnson Valley.”

The council has opposed the base’s westward expansion for several years. A 2009 resolution warns a loss of off-roading access will lead to more illegal riding and take money from businesses whose customers are off-roaders.
 
the only good thing i see in this is that they are acknowledging that it will impact the OHV community and residents, and an endangered species. hopefully that will throw up some flags and help urge the higher ups to tell the corps they need to go east not west.
 
the only good thing i see in this is that they are acknowledging that it will impact the OHV community and residents, and an endangered species. hopefully that will throw up some flags and help urge the higher ups to tell the corps they need to go east not west.

it worries me though, currently, the environmentalists have a much louder voice than we do.

I think in the current political climate, given the choice between offroaders and environmentalists, the .gov will side with the enviros every time.
 
which is why the endangered tortises might save our land for us. their own study is showing that they will very nearly wipe an entire species off the planet.
 
give them an inch, they'll take a mile. that plan won't work for more than a few years at best.
 
which is why the endangered tortises might save our land for us. their own study is showing that they will very nearly wipe an entire species off the planet.

You would be amazed at how much leverage an endangered species has on a military installation.
 
You would be amazed at how much leverage an endangered species has on a military installation.

Agreed. I manage construction projects for the Army and we are CONSTANTLY being hamstrung by ESA issues. This isn't to say that they won't find a way around it, but by their own admission in the EIS that impacts would be unmitigable is a big roadblock for expansion.
 
Endangered species is enough to prevent crews from using heavy equipment to reopen water supply areas to Tombstone.
 
There's already large sections of habitat used by the tortoise on the existing base training areas. Not sure how much they'll care about endangering more. Right now, a tortoise sighting stops training until it clears the area.
 
There's already large sections of habitat used by the tortoise on the existing base training areas. Not sure how much they'll care about endangering more. Right now, a tortoise sighting stops training until it clears the area.

It's not a case of "since we already occupy their habitat, we might as well occupy a lot more of it". The expansion of the post into new areas of the habitat will be scrutinized heavily anyways; maybe moreso now.
 
Back
Top