- Location
- Torrance, CA
While I agree that chapter representatives need to be more involved in the national BOD business at least historically it is hardly a unique issue. When I was involved with the national BOD we had very little chapter representative precipitation. In fact both of the presidents you served under were guilty of that Remi.
This not meant as an excuse to offer why it's okay to ignore that role, just that it is part of a broader problem, I'd be curious if it is as rampant as it was four or five years ago.
Also - I agree that there should be no need for the national BOD to babysit the chapter BODs. If a chapter fails to take advantage of a program I don't think blame should fall on the national BOD. I know if I was in that position I wouldn't necessarily notice that chapter x did not submit because I'd be too busy managing the entire scope of the project.
As for "Saying that they are working on a plan and will let us peons in on it when they're good and ready," if that was directed at what I've posted in here all I am really at liberty to say is that there is a solution going in to place now. I'll any leave real announcements to the chapter BOD.
This not meant as an excuse to offer why it's okay to ignore that role, just that it is part of a broader problem, I'd be curious if it is as rampant as it was four or five years ago.
Also - I agree that there should be no need for the national BOD to babysit the chapter BODs. If a chapter fails to take advantage of a program I don't think blame should fall on the national BOD. I know if I was in that position I wouldn't necessarily notice that chapter x did not submit because I'd be too busy managing the entire scope of the project.
As for "Saying that they are working on a plan and will let us peons in on it when they're good and ready," if that was directed at what I've posted in here all I am really at liberty to say is that there is a solution going in to place now. I'll any leave real announcements to the chapter BOD.