• Welcome to the new NAXJA Forum! If your password does not work, please use "Forgot your password?" link on the log-in page. Please feel free to reach out to [email protected] if we can provide any assistance.

I'm confused about this,..

tbburg

NAXJA Forum User
Location
Scottsdale AZ
'Saw this article on major problems to worry about in 2012 from the Council on Foreign relations(whoever that is,..) Anyway, here's a link to the article:

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/how-to-worry/

if you’re looking for things to worry about in the coming year (and I’m sure most of you are), the Council on Foreign Relations has come up with a handy Preventive Priorities Survey for 2012 which helps you determine what to worry about and how much you should be worried. The contingencies are categorized by severity into tiers, Tier I being contingencies that are likely to trigger U. S. military involvement, Tier II being contingencies that affect countries of strategic importance to the U. S. but are less likely to trigger U. S. military action, and Tier III being contingencies that may have serious humanitarian consequences but do not have strategic importance.

Here are the Tier I contingencies:
a mass casualty attack on the U.S. homeland or on a treaty ally
a severe North Korean crisis (e.g., armed provocations, internal political instability, advances in nuclear weapons/ICBM capability)
a major military incident with China involving U.S. or allied forces
an Iranian nuclear crisis (e.g., surprise advances in nuclear weapons/delivery capability, Israeli response)
a highly disruptive cyberattack on U.S. critical infrastructure (e.g., telecommunications, electrical power, gas and oil, water supply, banking and finance, transportation, and emergency services)
a significant increase in drug trafficking violence in Mexico that spills over into the United States
severe internal instability in Pakistan, triggered by a civil-military crisis or terror attacks
political instability in Saudi Arabia that endangers global oil supplies
a U.S.-Pakistan military confrontation, triggered by a terror attack or U.S. counterterror operations
intensification of the European sovereign debt crisis that leads to the collapse of the euro, triggering a double-dip U.S. recession and further limiting budgetary resources

Full list of survey results here

Here's where I run into a problem:
..,Tier I being contingencies that are likely to trigger U. S. military involvement,..
And at the bottom of the list:
..,intensification of the European sovereign debt crisis that leads to the collapse of the euro, triggering a double-dip U.S. recession and further limiting budgetary resources
How could a recession(or depression) here, or a monetary crisis in the EU, up to/including the collapse of the monetary union and disbandment of the euro trigger US military involvement? Are they expecting such widespread unrest/social dishevel as to require US military assistance to keep the peace in Europe? Do they expect it here? The economic upheaval to disrupt energy supplies enough for us to start some more sh** in the mid-east?

Any thoughts?
 
Back
Top