Child predator SCUM are SCUM and should be punished HORRIBLY for the damage they do, regardless of where they are from.
But what makes it worse is when it is a CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIEN, that shouldn't have been here in the first place if our PUSSY politicians and PUSSY judges and PUSSY district attorneys had done their jobs in the first place--that small child ruined for life because those that should be protecting her and all of the other children don't have any BALLS.
Send him back to Mexico--yes, AFTER a horrible punishment that would ensure his inability to ever attack another child anywhere in the world. Doesn't matter if the POS SCUM child molester is Polish, Russian, Canadian, Asian, Indian, Norwegian--or American.
As I'd said - emasculate him and deport him. Send him to Tierra del Fuego, send his balls to that volcano in Iceland.
@DrMoab - perhaps most of the responses in this thread sound entirely too much like vigilantism for some, but consider: between people being soft-shoed out of some misguided desire to be "politically correct" and the "Let 'em Loose, Bruce" judges on the bench
and the lawyers who constantly try to defend those they know to be guilty, is it any surprise that there is a populist backlash?
If the CJ system were doing its job properly, and the ICE were doing
its job effectively, we'd not have this backlash reaction. But, they aren't - so we have.
Besides, there are those of us who are seriously "black and white" on some core issues - as far as I'm concerned, for instance, heinous crimes against the person should be capital. That includes murder, assault with intent, malicious wounding, unlawful sexual battery (using natural or "foreign object,") molestation, and the like.
Those who commit "lewd and lascivious acts" should be watched - they can (and often do) "graduate" into sexual battery.
And, when someone's guilt can be proven scientifically, logically, and without the merest shadow of doubt, I have no trouble with them being executed - if their crime should warrant it. And, if you can prove it to me to
my satisfaction, I've no trouble throwing the switch/dropping the pill/pushing the plunber/pulling the lever/dropping the hammer myself. This makes ethical and logical sense - if you can't
do it
yourself, how can you support someone else doing it?
And, this outlook has nothing whatever to do with ethnicity - I don't care what colour your skin is. If you're a decent individual, I'll treat you decently. If you're civil, I'll treat you civilly. If you're bent on criminal intent, I'll shoot you. If I catch you in the commission of a crime, there's a good chance I'll unscrew your head and throw it in the Dumpster - if that's what it takes to stop you.
I know this tends to fly in the face of another of my attitudes on criminal matters - namely, "Everybody gets one." The overstigmatisation of people with the "felon" tag hung on them is largely responsible for the high rate of recidivism. As I see it, if your crime isn't violent, and isn't a result of the abuse of a public trust, then the following should happen: after you serve your time and compleat your probation/parole, the record gets sealed away and you get a second chance. If you live according to the rules of ethical behaviour and don't make any more trouble (read: you have rehabilitated,) nothing need happen. Once the record gets sealed away, you get
all of your rights back, and life is just as it was before.
Screw up again, and the record comes out and you get clobbered for
both offenses. NB: This doesn't include "violations of parole or probation," unless such violation results from a brand-new offense and not simply violating the conditions.
Removing the stigma will help those who
want to rehabilitate themselves, will help reduce recidivism, and will have a beneficial effect on society at large. This is how things used to be, fifty or sixty years ago.
Now, if you have committed a crime against the person (which is typically either an act of violence or a threat of violence) and it wasn't enough for you to get executed as a result; then I think you
should have a big red "WARNING" flag on your record. Stigmatisation may be extreme - people can't rehabilitate unless you give them the opportunity to do so - but it should be known that you're potentially dealing with a hazzard of some type.