Ecomike said:
If he did not replace the filter dryer with an R-134a dryer, then the R-12 desicant in the old dryer could have decomposed, gotten loose in the system and killed the compressor. I am told the old R-12 desicant is not compatible the new R-134a and the R-134a oil it uses.
There are lot of people making the switch over with out upgrading the dryers, but I think many of their compressors are self destructing within a year or so of the change due to the dryer desicant incompatability. It does not happen immediately.
This statement is not true. The oils used are differant. The old mineral based oil doesn't mix with the 134a refrigerant. The reason the drier is replace is for prevention. If the drier comes apart there is a screen to catch any particles. If it gets past that screen it will restrict the expansion valve. Here is some information from the EPA guidlines.
OEM Retrofits
Vehicle manufacturers (also known as original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs) have developed retrofit kits or guidelines for some of their models. These procedures were designed to provide the best level of performance with the new R-134a system. Although using these kits and guidelines will provide the greatest assurance that comparable a/c performance will be achieved, the costs of these OEM procedures will in many instances be relatively high. For example, while certain models can receive an OEM-warrantied retrofit for under $150, including labor, other OEM retrofits will run a customer over $650. Many car owners will not want to pay such high costs for a retrofit and may look to the aftermarket for a less expensive solution.
In addition, because the OEM retrofit kits and guidelines are generally only available for late 1980s and early 1990s models, an aftermarket retrofit may be the only option for many vehicle owners.
Least-Cost Aftermarket Retrofit
Many car owners may express interest in receiving a least-cost retrofit. Procedures required for a least-cost retrofit are simple and do not require major component changes. Generally, the process calls for removal of the old refrigerant, installation of new fittings and a new label, and the addition of either a polyalkylene glycol (PAG) or polyol ester (POE or ester) lubricant as well as the R-134a refrigerant. For many vehicles, this simple, least-cost retrofit should provide the vehicle owner either with a/c performance comparable to the R-12 system performance or with a/c performance that, although slightly reduced, is still sufficient to satisfy the customer. A least-cost retrofit, however, may not provide a satisfactory solution for certain vehicles.
EPA Requirements for Retrofit
According to EPA regulations, the use of any alternative refrigerant to replace R-12 requires at a minimum that:
- unique service fittings be used in order to minimize the risk of cross-contamination of either the air- conditioning system or the service facility's recycling equipment;
- the new refrigerant be identified by a uniquely-colored label in order to identify the refrigerant in the system;
- all R-12 be properly removed from the system before filling the system with an alternative refrigerant;
- in order to prevent release of refrigerant to the atmosphere, a high-pressure compressor shutoff switch be installed on any system equipped with a pressure relief device; and
- separate, dedicated EPA-approved equipment be used to recover the R-12 from the system.
- In addition, alternative refrigerant blends that contain HCFC-22 must be used with barrier hoses.
A Word on Replacements Other Than R-134a
A number of refrigerants other than R-134a have been listed by EPA as acceptable under its Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program, or are under SNAP review. The SNAP program evaluates substitutes only for their effect on human health and the environment, and not for performance or durability. None of these refrigerants have been endorsed by the OEMs for use in vehicles, and few have had extensive testing in a wide range of vehicle models. In addition, most are currently not readily available in all areas of the country.
While some manufacturers of alternatives may be marketing their products as "drop-ins," keep in mind that because the regulations described above apply to any substitute for R-12, there is no such thing as a refrigerant that can literally be dropped in on top of the existing R-12 in the system. For more information on the SNAP requirements and on which alternatives have been reviewed, accepted, or deemed unacceptable by EPA, call the Ozone Hotline number above and request a copy of "Choosing and Using Alternative Refrigerants in Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning" or read it
online.
Many service techs believe that R-134a is only a temporary replacement for R-12, to be used until a drop-in replacement that cools well and does not require a retrofit becomes available. Current research indicates that no such replacement refrigerant exists. The worldwide automotive industry conducted extensive research and testing on many potential substitutes for R-12 before selecting R-134a. EPA is not aware of any plans by the automakers to use any refrigerant in new vehicles other than R-134a.
Lubricants
PAGs vs. Esters
The mineral oil used with R-12 cannot be sufficiently transported throughout the a/c system by R-134a. Automobile manufacturers tested both PAGs and esters for refrigerant/lubricant miscibility, lubricity, chemical stability and materials compatibility. In the process of developing recommendations, they also considered the additives and conditioners present in the oils. Most - but not all - chose to use PAG lubricants in new vehicles equipped with R-134a, and are also recommending PAG lubricants for retrofits. Some compressor manufacturers are shipping new compressors with PAGs, some with esters, and some are shipping them empty.
PAGs are hygroscopic, which means that they will draw water from the atmosphere when exposed. Many aftermarket a/c specialists are choosing to use ester lubricants because they believe that the hygroscopic characteristics of PAGs may limit their lubricating ability and introduce corrosion into an a/c system. Esters are also hygroscopic (although less so than PAGs), and care must still be taken to ensure that excess moisture does not go into the system.
It is good practice to use PVC-coated gloves (or, if that is impractical, barrier creams) and safety goggles when handling these lubricants, since prolonged skin contact and/or even brief eye contact can cause irritations such as stinging and burning sensations. You should also avoid breathing any vapors produced by the lubricants, and make sure to use them in well ventilated areas. And be sure to keep both PAGs and esters in tightly sealed containers, both so that humidity does not contaminate the oil, and so that vapors do not escape.
Flushing
The amount of mineral oil that can safely remain in a system after retrofitting, without affecting performance, is still being debated. It was originally thought that any mineral oil left in the system might cause system failure. As long as the tech has removed as much of the old mineral oil as possible, any residual R-12 left in the system should not have a significant effect on the performance of the system. Removing the mineral oil may require draining certain components. Unless the vehicle manufacturer recommends flushing the system during the retrofit procedure, a service tech can assume that flushing is not necessary. (Although the SAE J1661 procedure for retrofit includes flushing, SAE no longer believes that flushing is critical to a successful retrofit.)
Hoses and O-Rings
When R-134a was first introduced, it was thought that all non-barrier/nitrile hoses would have to be replaced during an a/c retrofit. Early laboratory tests showed that the small R-134a molecules leaked through the walls of non-barrier hoses more readily than the larger R-12 molecules did. In the lab, this caused unacceptably high leakage rates. More recent testing, however, has shown that oil used in automotive a/c systems is absorbed into the hose to create a natural barrier to R-134a permeation. In most cases, the R-12 system hoses will perform well, provided they are in good condition. Cracked or damaged hoses should always be replaced with barrier hoses.
Unless a fitting has been disturbed during the retrofit process, replacement should not be necessary. Most retrofit instructions call for lubricating replaced O-rings with mineral oil to provide this protection.
Compressors
Industry experts once thought that a retrofit would require compressor replacement. This belief helped create some of the horror stories about the expense of retrofitting. Now it is routinely accepted that most compressors that are functioning well in R-12 systems will continue to function after the systems have been retrofitted.
When a compressor is first run with R-12, a thin film of metal chloride forms on bearing surfaces and acts as an excellent anti-wear agent. This film continues to protect after the system has been converted to R-134a. This helps explain why a new R-12 compressor may fail more quickly if it is installed in an R-134a system without the benefit of a break-in period on R-12.
A few older compressors use seals that are not compatible with either R-134a or the new lubricants. The compressor manufacturer can identify which compressors need special attention. Any compressor that has seals made of Viton® should not be used with R-134a because the refrigerant will cause the seals to swell excessively. Of course, any compressor that is not in good shape should be replaced during the retrofit procedure. Service techs should make sure that any replacement compressor is approved for R-134a by its supplier.
Desiccants, Accumulators, Receiver/Driers
R-12 systems use an XH-5 desiccant, while R-134a systems use either XH-7 or XH-9 desiccant. Some manufacturers recommend routine replacement of the accumulator or receiver-drier to one containing XH-7 or XH-9 during the retrofit procedure. (Any systems with silica gel should also be switched to XH-7 or -9 desiccant.) Others recommend leaving it alone. Manufacturers generally agree, however, that the accumulator or receiver-drier should be replaced if the vehicle has over 70,000 miles or is older than five years, and is opened up for major repair. In that case, the only recommendation is to use the R-134a-compatible desiccants.