Mattbred,
That is the typical proper analysis, but I ran into some interesting links and followed them one day and discovered some real intersting stuff.
Turns out the US DOE did some real intersting research studies on hydrogen fuel supplementation (think of it as a fuel blend B15 bio-disel or E10 ethanol) back in 1978 during the last arab oil embargo in the late 70's. I have not ordered and read the paper itself, but I found the citations and abstract that claim that hydrogen fuel suplementation to diesel (and I think gas) engines makes the diesel fuel burn cleaner during heavy engine loads, and the dyno yields go up by something like 35% for just a small amount of hydrogen (maybe 5% of the increased energy yield, so a net yield of 30% increased fuel mileage oout the diesel). Don't quote as me I going from memory of what I read once about 8 weeks ago. The bad diesel emmisions dropped by like 95%, and the net power (read as increased mpgs) increased by like 30%.
I also found a Canadian company, currently going public (stock exchange) that is marketing these rigs to 18 wheel freight haulers for $30,000 to $50,000 ea., and showing a 6 monh RTO (Return on investment). Supposedly they have sold thousands of them to major trucking firms up north in the last 2 years already.
The third thing I ran into was in a thread here, I think, a few weeks ago, where someone mentioned using thermo electric generators to produce the DC power to run the electrolysis cells. I researched that and found that a reversed solid state device ( it has a name, but I forgot what it is called, just Google "peltier effect" and "thermo electric generator" ) , ( Peltier effect solid state refrigerator run back wards) can turn waste heat into DC power. They have been too costly in the past to get much use, but that seems to have changed. So you take the waste heat from the cat converter and muffler and flow it through one of these devices and the heat flow generates enough DC power to run the electrolysis cell. You use waste heat to generate the electricity.
I would avoid sodium carbonate for the electrolyte, I would use potssium hydroxide in a stainless steel (min), or platinum coated titanium vessel and rod if I was seriously going to build one.
I think some of them use a small vent inlet on the electrolysis vessel to draw fresh air into and through the electrolysis cell on the way to the throttle body inlet. This dilutes the HHO gas with additional O2, which is the source of their O2 sensor problem. The excess purge O2 is seen in the newer cars, and the ECU / PCM calls for more fuel to balance the A/F ratio. I would be a little worried about running pure HHO gas in the supply line, and it would take a while to just to fill the line before the engine saw any HHO gas, which not be any good for short local trips.
I have thought about buying the old DOE paper (probably out of print, which means a trip to the Rice library some odd year for me) and playing with just H2 gas from a small lab bottle.
Lastly, the extra water gas produced during combustion seems to be beneficial like a water mister in the intake, it cools the combustion (acts like a thermal regulator to keep it from overheating), it generates more combustion pressure, but the HHO combustion initially helps the other fuels burn hotter and more completely without any lean combustion overheating problems.
Not sure I got the whole picture down here, but so far it is the first time since I first heard of HHO, Browns gas 25 years ago, that I think I see a real possible future for it in our world. If it truely cuts diesel fuel costs by 35% just running off the alternator and cleans up the emissions with out all the new emissions crap they are hanging on the new diesels, I have no doubt they will be all over the place real soon.
I am real interested in the solid state thermo generators myself.
mattbred said:
Getting more energy out of the combustion of Hydrogen than it takes to seperate hydrogen from oxygen violates the law of thermodynamics. Nevermind the efficiency loss of a combustion engine.
Simply put, it would put more of a load on your engine to generate the stuff than you would get out of it, giving you less MPG and perhaps problems down the road. (water in your combustion chambers all the time isn't good.
Unless you also have a bunch of batteries seperate from the charging system on your jeep that powers the electrolysis, you're wasting your money.