• Welcome to the new NAXJA Forum! If your password does not work, please use "Forgot your password?" link on the log-in page. Please feel free to reach out to [email protected] if we can provide any assistance.

OHV's Banned from 11,305 Acres of desert in SoCal (Including JV)

IntrepidXJ

NAXJA Member #647
Posted on P4x4 here: http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=482210

---------------------------------------------------------------------


BLM To Impose OHV Ban In At Popular Southern CAl Riding Spot


6/13/2006
Sacramento, CA -- In a move that shocked off-highway vehicle (OHV) users and raised the ire of local government officials, the federal Bureau of Land Management said it would ban OHVs from 11,305 acres of southern California desert by end of summer, the American Motorcyclist Association (AMA) and BLM reports.
The ban affects part of the Johnson Valley OHV area that includes parts of Anderson Dry Lake and Cougar Buttes. The closure is an out-of-court settlement of part of a lawsuit filed by preservationist groups in March that alleges the BLM violated the federal Endangered Species Act.

The suit alleges the BLM failed to consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on the effects of the BLM-administered California Desert Conservation Area Plan on a number of threatened and endangered species.

In announcing the Johnson Valley closure, the BLM warned that settlement negotiations continue and further restrictions may be imposed on public uses in other areas of the California desert.

"This land closure is outrageous," said Royce Wood, AMA legislative affairs specialist. "It's another example of preservationists using the threat of lawsuits to shut down OHV riding areas instead of trying to accomplish their goals through any process that allows for public debate.
"We've seen this same tactic used in Kentucky and Utah in an effort to bully government officials," Wood continued. "These groups hope that federal agencies charged with administering lands for all Americans will cave in to their special-interest demands and reach an out-of-court settlement rather than face drawn-out and expensive court battles.

"What's particularly egregious about this latest action," he added, "is that it further restricts OHV use in an already limited riding area-- the Johnson valley OHV recreation area. Over the years, federal officials have cut OHV access further and further in the California desert, and it's time for that to stop."

The BLM agreed to close more than 49,000 acres in the 150,000-acre Algodones Dunes area in recent settlement negotiations with preservationists. The preservationists alleged the ban was needed to protect the endangered Peirson's milk-vetch plant, a member of the bean and pea family.

The settlement earned court approval June 3rd, said Roxie Trost, BLM outdoor recreation planner. The BLM puts the land closure at 11,305 acres. The BLM plans to post closure signs by June 22, just in time for the busy summer recreational season.

A coalition of recreational groups including the High Desert Multiple Use Coalition, Desert Vipers, San Diego Off-Road Coalition, California Association of 4 Wheel Drive Clubs and the BlueRibbon Coalition intervened in the action and were involved in last-minute settlement negotiations to try to protect OHV riding areas but did not accomplish anything because all they did was argue.

The 11,305-acre closure at Johnson Valley is "the first interim measure'' agreed to by the BLM and those who filed the lawsuit, and more could follow, the BLM said.
In May, in response to the lawsuit, the BLM agreed to consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on the effect of the California Desert Conservation Area Plan on threatened and endangered species. The interim closure will be in place at least until those talks conclude.
The BLM hopes to complete those talks late next year. The discussions could lead to further, and permanent, restrictions on public use of the desert covered by the California Desert Conservation Area Plan.

The BLM manages more than 9 million acres of the 25 million total acres in the California desert.

"The California Desert Protection Act dealt a massive blow to motorized recreation," Wood said. "It closed off access to vast areas of the desert and confined open OHV recreation to less than 2 percent of the land. But even that wasn't good enough for preservationist groups. They have clearly targeted the remaining acres open to motorized recreation with the intent of shutting down the entire desert."

Also protesting the closure were County supervisors, who noted that the shutdown could deliver a major blow to the area's economy. County officials estimate that recreational use of the area pumps about $25 million into the local economy each year.

In addition, county officials said this closure could pose safety risks, since it has the potential to crowd more OHV enthusiasts into a smaller area.

"The AMA encourages all OHV enthusiasts to contact BLM California State Director Mike Pool and tell him that we deserve compensation for the lost land," Wood said. "We want the BLM to find us, at minimum, an equal-sized riding area for every area we lose. We just can't afford to lose another acre."
Letters should go to: State Director Mike Pool, Bureau of Land Management, California State Office, 2800 Cottage Way, RM W-1834, Sacramento, CA 95825
 
I'm trading my Jeep for a Miata.
 
BrettM said:
i read that yesterday, it sounds like the only JV trail it closes is Outer Limits, but it's HUGE step in the wrong direction.

If it closes OL that REALLY SUCKS!

Outer Limits is my favorite trail on this planet we call Earth.
 
Jes said:
If it closes OL that REALLY SUCKS!

Outer Limits is my favorite trail on this planet we call Earth.

I don't think it would close the trail, just maybe the road out to the trail.
We might be running OL top to bottom & back up next time.

Paul
 
Zuki-Ron said:
Where did this originate?
Sure the Link was to Pirate, but where did that poster get it from?

Ron

good question. i just went and did a bunch of research, and couldn't find it anywhere. so I went back to the original source (where the post from P4x4 originated from) and it looks like it may be a hoax.

http://www.glamisdunes.com/invision/index.php?showtopic=78348

I'll see what else I can find out.
 
So, the story apppears to be a re-write of another article...
But what about the "original"? What are it's credentials?
The article found on Off-Road.com, where did it originate?
The only clue was the reference to the AMA. I looked there, no go.
I suspect the whole thing is BS.


I would, and have researched the source before reposting info as it is easy in any medium to get into the "It is in print, it must be true" attitude.

BRC press releases look like this:

http://www.sharetrails.org/releases/media/index.cfm?story=467&archive=1

UFWDAs look like this:
http://www.ufwda.org/news_view.php?id=40

and finally, BLM- California info is here:
http://www.blm.gov/ca/

Though the statement rings true that we must try and salvage what areas we still have, we must actually actively look for areas of opportunity and not get into the midset of trying to protect our stash of nuts.
 
Last edited:
geee...thanks for the lesson on internet searching :rolleyes:

I have been a follower of Land Use issues for quite a while now, and have never come across a hoax from the sites I frequent. This is the first one. I will now be sure to triple check everything before cross-posting in the future. But at least I am out there trying to make a difference, unlike the majority of wheelers.

BTW- I ran a search on AMA for the article on Off-road.com,a nd their site does not go back that far. However there are newer articles relating to the incident that happened in 2000 (it did happen BTW)

http://www.amadirectlink.com/news/2006/Glamis.asp

http://www.amadirectlink.com/legisltn/releases/2003/G03013.asp

See.....I can search :rolleyes:

Zuki-Ron said:
So, the story apppears to be a re-write of another article...
But what about the "original"? What are it's credentials?
The article found on Off-Road.com, where did it originate?
The only clue was the reference to the AMA. I looked there, no go.
I suspect the whole thing is BS.


I would, and have researched the source before reposting info as it is easy in any medium to get into the "It is in print, it must be true" attitude.

BRC press releases look like this:

http://www.sharetrails.org/releases/media/index.cfm?story=467&archive=1

UFWDAs look like this:
http://www.ufwda.org/news_view.php?id=40

and finally, BLM- California info is here:
http://www.blm.gov/ca/

Ron
 
IntrepidXJ said:
geee...thanks for the lesson on internet searching :rolleyes:
Hey, don't be like that. Oh, I see... You took it wrong. I meant that when I repost, I research it. I was not laying blame.

I have been a follower of Land Use issues for quite a while now, and have never come across a hoax from the sites I frequent. This is the first one. I will now be sure to triple check everything before cross-posting in the future. But at least I am out there trying to make a difference, unlike the majority of wheelers.

First one I have seen that looked intentional. I have gotten stung so many times with a 4WD Association I used to belong to; gossip, hearsay... that I tend to check references. Every land issue I see here, I check for validity if I decide to repost to another forum (actually I just link them here instead of reposting the text).

A lot of the Land Issues I'm interested in are WI specific, but it is sometimes interesting to see problems other areas are having.

BTW- I ran a search on AMA for the article on Off-road.com,a nd their site does not go back that far. However there are newer articles relating to the incident that happened in 2000 (it did happen BTW)

http://www.amadirectlink.com/news/2006/Glamis.asp

http://www.amadirectlink.com/legisltn/releases/2003/G03013.asp

See.....I can search :rolleyes:

Nice job and interesting to see that at least one of the events happened.
I see the "Official" AMA report does not have any of the hype, just the facts.
Also has a pretty (c) on the bottom to show it is real :)
 
Last edited:
With the Johnson Valley scare we had today everyone found themselfs wondering if they are doing their part to conserve the environment and to help with the efforts to keep the Center for Biological diversity at bay.

I would like to offer a way to donate money to the cause.

As you probably already know, the Tin Benders (and Pirate4x4) have been standing behind Friends of Paniment Valley (FOPV) and the fight to re-open Surprise Canyon.

Amazingly enough, there is actually a chance that we will be sucessful in re-opening this trail. But more money is needed to pay legal fees.

The best part of this, and the reason that you should really consider donating money to FOPV is to set a legal precedence. If we can get this trail re-opened, this will set a great precedence for future legal battles.

We (the Tin Benders) have decided to build and raffle a complete turn key formula Toy. You can go to our website www.tinbenders.org and click on "Raffle" for more information and to purchase tickets.

This is one way to donate money. The other way would be to contact myself or FOPV and arrange a cash donation.

There will be a formal announcement Tommorrow, I just thought it would be good to let you guys know now because of today's Johnson Valley scare.

Thanks for listening!

--Phillip Burum

PS- Should you have any problems, or want to contact me, you can get me by email @ [email protected]
 
Just a little update on the hoax:

from here: http://www.glamisdunes.com/invision/index.php?showtopic=78348

----------------------------------------------------------------------

I spoke to Roxie Trost of the Barstow BLM (the agency that manages Johnson Valley) and she said she's heard the same rumor and it's just not true.

Apparently someone, probably the same nimrod who started the hoax, is going so far as to place closure signs.

This is illegal and it's being pursued by law enforcement. If anyone sees anyone placing these signs, please get a detailed description and contact law enforcement right away.
 
IntrepidXJ said:
Just a little update on the hoax:

from here: http://www.glamisdunes.com/invision/index.php?showtopic=78348

----------------------------------------------------------------------

I spoke to Roxie Trost of the Barstow BLM (the agency that manages Johnson Valley) and she said she's heard the same rumor and it's just not true.

Apparently someone, probably the same nimrod who started the hoax, is going so far as to place closure signs.

This is illegal and it's being pursued by law enforcement. If anyone sees anyone placing these signs, please get a detailed description and contact law enforcement right away.

So, your name is "Vicki" ?
 
Back
Top