PDA

View Full Version : aw4 shift points


j99xj
October 9th, 2006, 13:57
Hi everyone. Just a quick question....at what rpm do your aw4's upshift at full throttle?

Mine shifts at 4800 rpm, and I don't know why it doesn't go all the way to the redline (5250) like it should.

I've done all the intake and exhaust mods so I know the engine is capable of revving to 5250 rpm and still make decent power. I'd love to have an extra 450 rpm while passing on the highway.

BigG
October 9th, 2006, 15:04
Mine appears to shift right at the 5000 line.

ktm racer 419
October 9th, 2006, 15:10
the 4.0 makes the most power around 3500-4000 rpm's no need to rev any higher, it's just excess noise.

j99xj
October 9th, 2006, 15:36
the 4.0 makes the most power around 3500-4000 rpm's no need to rev any higher, it's just excess noise.

3500-4000 rpms is on the peak torque "plateau" but my peak horsepower is much higher than that. Like I said I've done lots of mods that increase airflow, and I'm almost positive my engine is capable of revving to, and making decent power at 5250 rpms.

I wanted to know what everybodys aw4 shifted at so I could make an informed decision as to whether or not my aw4 is operating correctly. I'm tempted to get the hypertech chip so I can bump the shift points up.

According to my "car test" computer simulation program, an increase in shift point rpm from 4800 to 5250 rpm will reduce 0-60 time by about 0.3 seconds. This is because I'm getting to use that last little bit of power, and holding the current gear longer)

p.b.
November 12th, 2006, 01:54
and what's your shifting points with light and moderate pressure on accelerator?
Paolo

lawsoncl
November 12th, 2006, 10:58
Of course, you are assuming that the tach is accurate.....

j99xj
November 14th, 2006, 23:01
and what's your shifting points with light and moderate pressure on accelerator?
Paolo

It's hard to say what is light throttle and moderate throttle but if I had to guess I'd say:

2200 rpm for light
2500-3500 for moderate

Atl XJ
November 15th, 2006, 11:12
the 4.0 makes the most power around 3500-4000 rpm's no need to rev any higher, it's just excess noise.
Thats not true at all, mine pulls hard and fast to the 5250 redline.

FatXJ
November 15th, 2006, 12:52
99XJ at WOT shifts at 4800, I have also been wondering why it won't go further with it in D. I mexishift it when I am racing.

Atl XJ
November 17th, 2006, 11:00
The later XJs won't redline themselves for some reason, by 96 will though.

j99xj
December 19th, 2006, 20:49
Any more ideas why my aw4 shifts 500 rpms before it should?

wilsel
December 20th, 2006, 05:42
Of course, you are assuming that the tach is accurate.....

Yeah, probably as accurate as the oil pressure gauge

92DripCherokee
December 20th, 2006, 07:28
Might be the throttle valve cable is little tight, causing earlier shifts. If you loosen the TV adjuster, do it very slightly so it does'nt cause trans slipping.

BBeach
December 20th, 2006, 07:51
My aw4 does about the same 4800 in first gear, and a little bit higher in second, maybe 4950-5000. Like one of the guys said, tach could always be wrong or whatever but still, i think that it shifts early to get you into the next gear early on for maximum acceleration, because that is what you're trying to do when at WOT. I could be wrong, and probably am but according to my dyno charts a little while back it seemed the power started to curve down pretty quick after 4300rpm, and the hp at 4900rpm was matching that of 3500rpm (basically the starting point of 2nd gear once it shifted). That would be my only guess, and I do have an intake and exhaust mods. But id wait for dr.dyno to chime in.

BBeach
December 20th, 2006, 07:53
On a side note, if my tranny fluid is right above the add mark, would that affect the performance of the transmission significantly?

j99xj
December 20th, 2006, 09:53
Well last night I was on an open road and I put the tranny in the 1-2 selection and MADE IT hold 2nd gear until I hit the rev limiter just to prove that I could indeed rev that high and make decent power up there.

And I indeed made it to the rev limiter....and boy the little 4.0 still ran excellent. No bad noises, no shaking, just the hum of a full exhaust system.

On a side note the rev limiter scared the hell out of me because it cut in so hard, almost like someone tapped the brakes.

I just want it to shift from 1st to 2nd at 5200 rpms, not 4700-4800 for that extra few seconds of "punch".

techno1154
December 20th, 2006, 11:39
Well last night I was on an open road and I put the tranny in the 1-2 selection and MADE IT hold 2nd gear until I hit the rev limiter just to prove that I could indeed rev that high and make decent power up there.

And I indeed made it to the rev limiter....and boy the little 4.0 still ran excellent. No bad noises, no shaking, just the hum of a full exhaust system.

On a side note the rev limiter scared the hell out of me because it cut in so hard, almost like someone tapped the brakes.

I just want it to shift from 1st to 2nd at 5200 rpms, not 4700-4800 for that extra few seconds of "punch".

You may need a TCM modification or hold the gear manually. Except for racing with a closely matched vehicle, there may be little real advantage for doing this.

BBeach
December 20th, 2006, 19:41
While on the topic of transmissions, i know i prolly shouldnt do it, but i drop it into the 1-2 positon while going say 35mph and itd go to 2nd gear almost all the time, and then down to 1st gear at around 25mph. But the other day, it decided to go into first gear momentarily then jumped into second gear. Is there any reason for it to do that or was it just a random fluke?

j99xj
December 20th, 2006, 20:32
While on the topic of transmissions, i know i prolly shouldnt do it, but i drop it into the 1-2 positon while going say 35mph and itd go to 2nd gear almost all the time, and then down to 1st gear at around 25mph. But the other day, it decided to go into first gear momentarily then jumped into second gear. Is there any reason for it to do that or was it just a random fluke?

Maybe you had your foot on the gas farther than usual, and that freaked out the throttle position sensor for a second.

BBeach
December 20th, 2006, 20:53
Maybe you had your foot on the gas farther than usual, and that freaked out the throttle position sensor for a second.Im not hitting the gas when decelerating.

j99xj
December 20th, 2006, 22:53
Oh. Sorry. I usually only shift into the 1-2 position when I'm climbing really steep Colorado mountains, and it sometimes kicks down to 1st with my foot on the gas going uphill around 25 too.

BBeach
December 22nd, 2006, 10:18
Oh. Sorry. I usually only shift into the 1-2 position when I'm climbing really steep Colorado mountains, and it sometimes kicks down to 1st with my foot on the gas going uphill around 25 too.I think it'll always kick down with you foot on the gas or not at 25-26mph, and at 31~mph under full throttle. I guess it depends on the vehicle, tps condition, tires, gearing, etc. But does anyone know why it'll go for 1st gear even at speeds around 40-50mph, it'll temporarily catch and you can feel the torque converter slip and go back to second or whichever...

cal
December 22nd, 2006, 12:49
Sometimes the 1-2 sensor jumps between gears a little unexpectedly .. that's a lot of the reason compushift made a shift computer for the aw4 (no longer available, but you can find them, i got one last year for $75 on ebay). You can also control the 1-2 setup with toggle switches, search here.

87manche
December 22nd, 2006, 13:01
www.awshifting.com
how much is that extra 400 rpm's worth?

j99xj
December 23rd, 2006, 11:00
www.awshifting.com (http://www.awshifting.com)
how much is that extra 400 rpm's worth?

I'd say at least another 5 hp, maybe even more.

But its not just the top end I would gain, its the fact that I would be 400 rpms higher AFTER the shift to second gear.

Right now with a wot upshift at 4800 rpms, my tach falls to about 3200 rpms at the bottom of second gear.

If I could rev to 5200 or so, my tach would fall to 3600 rpms after the shift.

Since my engine makes more power and torque at 3600 rpms than at 3200 rpms, I should see a slight performance increase at the bottom of second gear, which should help me merge onto the highway.

BBeach
December 23rd, 2006, 21:15
I'd say at least another 5 hp, maybe even more.

But its not just the top end I would gain, its the fact that I would be 400 rpms higher AFTER the shift to second gear.

Right now with a wot upshift at 4800 rpms, my tach falls to about 3200 rpms at the bottom of second gear.

If I could rev to 5200 or so, my tach would fall to 3600 rpms after the shift.

Since my engine makes more power and torque at 3600 rpms than at 3200 rpms, I should see a slight performance increase at the bottom of second gear, which should help me merge onto the highway.
According to my dyno sheets, power went down after 4600 rpms, im not sure exactly what you meant by another 5hp but when peak is say 4600rpm, then by definition of peak, its only go to be lower from then on to redline. It depends on the other modifications to the vehicle as well but in our case its only advantage would be starting off at a higher rpm in the next gear. But in all honesty, i wouldnt want to take the risk of going past 5000rpm for something so minimal as a couple hundreths of a second of your ET at a dragstrip.

j99xj
December 23rd, 2006, 23:06
Yes, power falls and torque falls even faster at rpms like that.

But your forgetting about gearing.

I looked at your dyno sheet and I guestimated you have ~122 lb-ft at 4900 rpm, and ~187 lb-ft at 3600 rpm.

At first glance it would appear that you would achieve the best acceleration at 3600 rpm than at 4900 rpm, but thats ONLY for the current gear.

You make more torque at the wheels at 4900 rpm in 1st gear, than 3600 rpm in second.

122*2.8*3.55=~1213 lb-ft of torque
187*1.53*3.55=~1016 lb-ft of torque

Your torque would have to be less than about 102 lb-ft in order to make second gear a better choice ( and thus shift into it).


If you extend your torque curve down to the point where the torque output would be about 102 the rpms are about 5200, right at the rev limiter.

So that's why I'm convinced the rev limiter was set around 5250 or so because that is the optimum wot upshift point with the 4.0's powerband.

My problem is that mine shifts lower than that. :-(

BBeach
December 24th, 2006, 15:56
Yes, power falls and torque falls even faster at rpms like that.

But your forgetting about gearing.

I looked at your dyno sheet and I guestimated you have ~122 lb-ft at 4900 rpm, and ~187 lb-ft at 3600 rpm.

At first glance it would appear that you would achieve the best acceleration at 3600 rpm than at 4900 rpm, but thats ONLY for the current gear.

You make more torque at the wheels at 4900 rpm in 1st gear, than 3600 rpm in second.

122*2.8*3.55=~1213 lb-ft of torque
187*1.53*3.55=~1016 lb-ft of torque

Your torque would have to be less than about 102 lb-ft in order to make second gear a better choice ( and thus shift into it).


If you extend your torque curve down to the point where the torque output would be about 102 the rpms are about 5200, right at the rev limiter.

So that's why I'm convinced the rev limiter was set around 5250 or so because that is the optimum wot upshift point with the 4.0's powerband.

My problem is that mine shifts lower than that. :-(
Somebody correct me if im wrong, but when you do the math out with the transmission ratio (2.8 for 1st and 1.53 for second), thats when the torque converter is locked and when at WOT, when left in the D position, its not going to be locked. Also, it just seems that when you leave it in second to the redline, that it just doesnt "feel" as fast as when you're already in the next gear. This is the point where im starting to not have so much knowledge as far as if you're going to cover more distance (the point of a race) in a certain amount of time between those last few rpms vs. just starting off in the next gear. Im not sure if im getting my theory across and id rather let someone like dyno chime in. I would say an easy way would be for you to take it to a track (like i did with same experiement a while back), and hold it in 2nd till redline, and the next time just go all out in D.....from when i did it i got quicker times with the just leaving it in drive so idk. Sure there are variables such as different temperatures (very slight change,it was maybe 20 minutes after the first run i got another in) and such but I still feel that its better to just leave it in Drive. Im not sure if you get my reasoning, but maybe if you think of it this way, the time it covers to go from 5000rpm-5300rpm and then starting higher in the next gear vs time it takes to do the next gear, even if at a lower rpm.

j99xj
December 24th, 2006, 17:15
I think its different for everybody. I say do whatever gets you the best times. I just think mine has a little extra juice in the last available 500 rpms or so.

I think it all has to do with how well your engine can inhale and exhale. Everything from air filters to mufflers has an effect.

lawsoncl
December 24th, 2006, 22:53
Cripes, are we still beating this dead horse?

If you have a Renix or ODBI era Jeep (ie pre 1996/1997 changeover), then the TCU has no idea what the actual engine rpm is since it only has an output shaft speed sensor. So if you're getting slightly different WOT shift pints, the difference is probably caused by the unlocked torque converter slipping more or less.

Why flog your poor engine by redlining it anyway?

PETEY
December 24th, 2006, 23:11
If you wanted a "race" car, why did you buy a jeep? Jeeez, it's still just a low tech "tractor" motor. (sort of)

BBeach
December 25th, 2006, 08:51
Both of us have jeeps with OBDII for one, and lawsoncl, i said it wasnt good to redline it and rather shift at where it was designed to, so im not sure if that was aimed at me or what. And to PETEY, i didnt buy it, this was passed down to me as a graduation gift/birthday present two years ago. Sure, if i had the money and at the time was allowed to buy a "race car" i surely would have bought something other than a jeep. But some of us have to make due with what we have, for me to go and buy a $5000 car is out of the option, but for me to put a couple hundred into my jeep to make it a tiny bit faster (obviously not a race car) for whatever reason is an option. For every man his own right?

j99xj
December 25th, 2006, 09:09
People race lawn mowers with "low tech" engines too....

Like BBeach said some people have to make do with what they have, myself included.

I don't modify my Jeep to try and make it competitive against real sports cars, thats just foolish. Anyway I need a little extra performance because I have bigger tires with stock gears.

I modify my Jeep for the hobby of it, not the sport.

A few years ago I was bored off my ASS so I thought to myself, I wonder what a cat back exhaust system would sound like?? So I installed one and liked what it did for my Jeep.

And I've been hooked ever sinceu buying small and simple mods here and there, and the Jeep runs great.

Anyway if there weren't people concerned about performance I'm sure there wouldn't be the "street/performance" section of naxja. (even though I put this post in the oem one.)

lawsoncl
December 25th, 2006, 11:25
Both of us have jeeps with OBDII for one, and lawsoncl, i said it wasnt good to redline it and rather shift at where it was designed to, so im not sure if that was aimed at me or what.

Nope, not aimed at you. I was just pointing out that the TCU on pre OBDII doesn't know the actual engine rpm since a few of the postings were for the older Jeeps. The ODBII AW4 has a front shaft input speed sensor, but I'm not sure if thats even used for determining shift points. It was added for diagnostic purposes so the TCU could determine if the tranny is responding properly (ie in the right gear and if the t/c converter is actually locked).

Merry Holidays!