• Welcome to the new NAXJA Forum! If your password does not work, please use "Forgot your password?" link on the log-in page. Please feel free to reach out to [email protected] if we can provide any assistance.

Which are you?

5-90

NAXJA Forum User
Location
Hammerspace
I'm quite sure this has been posted before, but I honestly think - especially in this day and age - it bears repeating. I've made some comments afterwards...

----- SNIP -----
ON SHEEP, WOLVES, AND SHEEPDOGS

By LTC(RET) Dave Grossman, RANGER,
Ph.D., author of "On Killing."

Honor never grows old, and honor rejoices the heart of age. It does so because honor is, finally, about defending those noble and worthy things that deserve defending, even if it comes at a high cost. In our time, that may mean social disapproval, public scorn, hardship, persecution, or as always, even death itself. The question remains: What is worth defending? What is worth dying for? What is worth living for? - William J. Bennett - in a lecture to the United States Naval Academy November 24, 1997

One Vietnam veteran, an old retired colonel, once said this to me: "Most of the people in our society are sheep. They are kind, gentle, productive creatures who can only hurt one another by accident." This is true. Remember, the murder rate is six per 100,000 per year, and the aggravated assault rate is four per 1,000 per year. What this means is that the vast majority of Americans are not inclined to hurt one another.

Some estimates say that two million Americans are victims of violent crimes every year, a tragic, staggering number, perhaps an all-time record rate of violent crime. But there are almost 300 million Americans, which means that the odds of being a victim of violent crime is considerably less than one in a hundred on any given year. Furthermore, since many violent crimes are committed by repeat offenders, the actual number of violent citizens is considerably less than two million.

Thus there is a paradox, and we must grasp both ends of the situation: We may well be in the most violent times in history, but violence is still remarkably rare. This is because most citizens are kind, decent people who are not capable of hurting each other, except by accident or under extreme provocation. They are sheep.

I mean nothing negative by calling them sheep. To me, it is like the pretty, blue robin's egg. Inside it is soft and gooey but someday it will grow into something wonderful. But the egg cannot survive without its hard blue shell.

Police officers, soldiers, and other warriors are like that shell, and someday the civilization they protect will grow into something wonderful. For now, though, they need warriors to protect them from the predators.

"Then there are the wolves," the old war veteran said, "and the wolves feed on the sheep without mercy." Do you believe there are wolves out there who will feed on the flock without mercy? You better believe it. There are evil men in this world and they are capable of evil deeds. The moment you forget that or pretend it is not so, you become a sheep. There is no safety in denial.

"Then there are sheepdogs," he went on, "and I'm a sheepdog. I live to protect the flock and confront the wolf."

If you have no capacity for violence then you are a healthy productive citizen, a sheep. If you have a capacity for violence and no empathy for your fellow citizens, then you have defined an aggressive sociopath, a wolf.

But what if you have a capacity for violence, and a deep love for your fellow citizens? What do you have then? A sheepdog, a warrior, someone who is walking the hero's path. Someone who can walk into the heart of darkness, into the universal human phobia, and walk out unscathed

Let me expand on this old soldier's excellent model of the sheep, wolves, and sheepdogs. We know that the sheep live in denial, that is what makes them sheep. They do not want to believe that there is evil in the world. They can accept the fact that fires can happen, which is why they want fire extinguishers, fire sprinklers, fire alarms and fire exits throughout their kids' schools.

But many of them are outraged at the idea of putting an armed police officer in their kid's school. Our children are thousands of times more likely to be killed or seriously injured by school violence than fire, but the sheep's only response to the possibility of violence is denial. The idea of someone coming to kill or harm their child is just too hard, and so they chose the path of denial.

The sheep generally do not like the sheepdog. He looks a lot like the wolf. He has fangs and the capacity for violence. The difference, though, is that the sheepdog must not, cannot and will not ever harm the sheep. Any sheep dog who intentionally harms the lowliest little lamb will be punished and removed. The world cannot work any other way, at least not in a representative democracy or a republic such as ours.

Still, the sheepdog disturbs the sheep. He is a constant reminder that there are wolves in the land. They would prefer that he didn't tell them where to go, or give them traffic tickets, or stand at the ready in our airports, in camouflage fatigues, holding an M-16. The sheep would much rather have the sheepdog cash in his fangs, spray paint himself white, and go, "Baa." Until the wolf shows up. Then the entire flock tries desperately to hide behind one lonely sheepdog.

The students, the victims, at Columbine High School were big, tough high school students, and under ordinary circumstances they would not have had the time of day for a police officer. They were not bad kids; they just had nothing to say to a cop. When the school was under attack, however, and SWAT teams were clearing the rooms and hallways, the officers had to physically peel those clinging, sobbing kids off of them. This is how the little lambs feel about their sheepdog when the wolf is at the door.

Look at what happened after September 11, 2001 when the wolf pounded hard on the door. Remember how America, more than ever before, felt differently about their law enforcement officers and military personnel? Remember how many times you heard the word hero?

Understand that there is nothing morally superior about being a sheepdog; it is just what you choose to be. Also understand that a sheepdog is a funny critter: He is always sniffing around out on the perimeter, checking the breeze, barking at things that go bump in the night, and yearning for a righteous battle. That is, the young sheepdogs yearn for a righteous battle. The old sheepdogs are a little older and wiser, but they move to the sound of the guns when needed, right along with the young ones.

Here is how the sheep and the sheepdog think differently. The sheep pretend the wolf will never come, but the sheepdog lives for that day. After the attacks on September 11, 2001, most of the sheep, that is, most citizens in America said, "Thank God I wasn't on one of those planes." The sheepdogs, the warriors, said, "Dear God, I wish I could have been on one of those planes. Maybe I could have made a difference." When you are truly transformed into a warrior and have truly invested yourself into warriorhood, you want to be there. You want to be able to make a difference.

There is nothing morally superior about the sheepdog, the warrior, but he does have one real advantage. Only one. And that is that he is able to survive and thrive in an environment that destroys 98 percent of the population.

There was research conducted a few years ago with individuals convicted of violent crimes. These cons were in prison for serious, predatory crimes of violence: assaults, murders and killing law enforcement officers. The vast majority said that they specifically targeted victims by body language: Slumped walk, passive behavior and lack of awareness. They chose their victims like big cats do in Africa, when they select one out of the herd that is least able to protect itself.

Some people may be destined to be sheep and others might be genetically primed to be wolves or sheepdogs. But I believe that most people can choose which one they want to be, and I'm proud to say that more and more Americans are choosing to become sheepdogs.

Seven months after the attack on September 11, 2001, Todd Beamer was honored in his hometown of Cranbury, New Jersey. Todd, as you recall, was the man on Flight 93 over Pennsylvania who called on his cell phone to alert an operator from United Airlines about the hijacking. When he learned of the other three passenger planes that had been used as weapons, Todd dropped his phone and uttered the words, "Let's roll," which authorities believe was a signal to the other passengers to confront the terrorist hijackers. In one hour, a transformation occurred among the passengers - athletes, business people and parents. -- from sheep to sheepdogs and together they fought the wolves, ultimately saving an unknown number of lives on the ground.

There is no safety for honest men except by believing all possible evil of evil men. - Edmund Burke

Here is the point I like to emphasize, especially to the thousands of police officers and soldiers I speak to each year. In nature the sheep, real sheep, are born as sheep. Sheepdogs are born that way, and so are wolves. They didn't have a choice. But you are not a critter. As a human being, you can be whatever you want to be. It is a conscious, moral decision.

If you want to be a sheep, then you can be a sheep and that is okay, but you must understand the price you pay. When the wolf comes, you and your loved ones are going to die if there is not a sheepdog there to protect you. If you want to be a wolf, you can be one, but the sheepdogs are going to hunt you down and you will never have rest, safety, trust or love. But if you want to be a sheepdog and walk the warrior's path, then you must make a conscious and moral decision every day to dedicate, equip and prepare yourself to thrive in that toxic, corrosive moment when the wolf comes knocking at the door.

For example, many officers carry their weapons in church. They are well concealed in ankle holsters, shoulder holsters or inside-the-belt holsters tucked into the small of their backs. Anytime you go to some form of religious service, there is a very good chance that a police officer in your congregation is carrying. You will never know if there is such an individual in your place of worship, until the wolf appears to massacre you and your loved ones.

I was training a group of police officers in Texas, and during the break, one officer asked his friend if he carried his weapon in church. The other cop replied, "I will never be caught without my gun in church." I asked why he felt so strongly about this, and he told me about a cop he knew who was at a church massacre in Ft. Worth, Texas in 1999. In that incident, a mentally deranged individual came into the church and opened fire, gunning down fourteen people. He said that officer believed he could have saved every life that day if he had been carrying his gun. His own son was shot, and all he could do was throw himself on the boy's body and wait to die. That cop looked me in the eye and said, "Do you have any idea how hard it would be to live with yourself after that?"

Some individuals would be horrified if they knew this police officer was carrying a weapon in church. They might call him paranoid and would probably scorn him. Yet these same individuals would be enraged and would call for "heads to roll" if they found out that the airbags in their cars were defective, or that the fire extinguisher and fire sprinklers in their kids' school did not work. They can accept the fact that fires and traffic accidents can happen and that there must be safeguards against them.

Their only response to the wolf, though, is denial, and all too often their response to the sheepdog is scorn and disdain. But the sheepdog quietly asks himself, "Do you have any idea how hard it would be to live with yourself if your loved ones were attacked and killed, and you had to stand there helplessly because you were unprepared for that day?"

It is denial that turns people into sheep. Sheep are psychologically destroyed by combat because their only defense is denial, which is counterproductive and destructive, resulting in fear, helplessness and horror when the wolf shows up.

Denial kills you twice. It kills you once, at your moment of truth when you are not physically prepared: you didn't bring your gun, you didn't train. Your only defense was wishful thinking. Hope is not a strategy. Denial kills you a second time because even if you do physically survive, you are psychologically shattered by your fear, helplessness and horror at your moment of truth.

Gavin de Becker puts it like this in Fear Less, his superb post-9/11 book, which should be required reading for anyone trying to come to terms with our current world situation: "...denial can be seductive, but it has an insidious side effect. For all the peace of mind deniers think they get by saying it isn't so, the fall they take when faced with new violence is all the more unsettling."

Denial is a save-now-pay-later scheme, a contract written entirely in small print, for in the long run, the denying person knows the truth on some level. And so the warrior must strive to confront denial in all aspects of his life, and prepare himself for the day when evil comes.

If you are warrior who is legally authorized to carry a weapon and you step outside without that weapon, then you become a sheep, pretending that the bad man will not come today. No one can be "on" 24/7, for a lifetime. Everyone needs down time. But if you are authorized to carry a weapon, and you walk outside without it, just take a deep breath, and say this to yourself..."Baa."

This business of being a sheep or a sheep dog is not a yes-no dichotomy. It is not an all-or-nothing, either-or choice. It is a matter of degrees, a continuum. On one end is an abject, head-in-the-sand-sheep and on the other end is the ultimate warrior. Few people exist completely on one end or the other.

Most of us live somewhere in between. Since 9-11 almost everyone in America took a step up that continuum, away from denial. The sheep took a few steps toward accepting and appreciating their warriors, and the warriors started taking their job more seriously. The degree to which you move up that continuum, away from sheephood and denial, is the degree to which you and your loved ones will survive, physically and psychologically at your moment of truth.

"If It Weren't For The United States Military"
"There Would Be NO United States of America"

----- SNIP -----

My only real 'correction' that I think should be issued to the foregoing is simply this:

"There are no weapons that cannot be carried in the hands or upon the feet. The only weapon you own is between your ears - everything else is an extension of capability."

A firearm is not a weapon - it is simply an extension of the will with a useful range. A knife is not a weapon - it is a more localised extension of the will. Neither can be truly considered a 'weapon' - they are tools.

A firearm or a knife, on its own, is incapable of harming an individual. It is when they are picked up, and the intent of the holder is factored into the equation, that they approach being "dangerous."

Even bearing that in mind, I believe it was R. A. Heinlein who first said, "There are no 'dangerous weapons,' only 'dangerous men.'" True - very true. Another observation on that point - I differentiate between "dangerous" and "lethal" men - a "dangerous man" has the potential to constitute a constant danger to his fellowman. A "lethal man" is no less dangerous - but is a great deal more controlled. With autority comes responsibility - and if a man has taken the time to turn himself into a "lethal man," then he understands the authority he can potentially exert over another, and therefore feels the weight of responsibility - of the need to control - at all times. I'd sooner be locked into a room with a "lethal" man than a "dangerous" man - chances are, we'll both walk out later. Lock me into a room with a "dangerous" man, and one of us will probably die (odds are, it won't be me. But, you never can tell...)

I place myself into the "lethal" category - I am capable of exerting power to extinguish the life of another - and because of that, I am more consciously aware of the force that I can bring to bear when facing and dealing with a threat. Since California does not generally allow one to carry a firearm, I have to extend my will with knives, sticks, and the occasional wall - and I know how to use very nearly anything and everything to neutralise a threat. My only worry when dealing with something silly is that I may exceed the level of force requred through no conscious decision of my own - but I've manged not to. I'm perfectly capable of killing someone - and have done so in the past, with anything from bare hands on up! - but I make an effort not to if the situation does not warrant it.

As far as 'acting in anger,' I don't think I've struck anyone in pure anger - in the heat of the moment - since I was ten years old. Partly because I haven't had to, and partly because I was then well on my way to becoming "lethal," and beginning to understand the power and the responsibility of that fact.

So, are you "safe," "dangerous," or "lethal," as previously defined? Liken these to "sheep," "wolf," and "sheepdog..."

Like I said, I'm sure this has been posted here before, but it's worth another read, and I'd never commented on it before anyhow...

5-90
 
Quite all right. Like I said, I was reasonably sure it was a repost - but I thought it worth reading again, and I didn't have a chance to comment last time. If I'd dug up the thing, it would probably have ended up divorcing my comments severely - and I'd wanted to keep them as close to the source material as possible anyhow.

I've long classified people in that way - just not in those terms. I hadn't had the chance to apply thought to come up with labels for those categories - and I wasn't sure I'd wanted to. I guess I thought of it more as "people," "threats," and "protectors" - usually classifying myself in the latter bin...

5-90
 
:compwork: relax my friend, i'm not reading all that

you wanna dumb it down a bit
 
Some concepts do not relate well in simple terms - something gets lost in the translation.

Granted, it's all in pretty plain American right now (I'd say English, but it's not. "The English and the Americans are two people separated by a common language...") but if I try to simplify it any more, I'm sure something will be left out.

There isn't much of anything in there that I'd be willing to consider "semantically null." I try not to talk that way anyhow.

5-90
 
huh?


stop now! sit down have a few beers and come back and type normally
 
Come now, that is fairly normal for me! Granted, I don't drink beer, but I'm also out of rum for now (my beverage of choice - saves me from the ill effects of drinking California water...) and that doesn't help my state of mind any...

If you've been reading my writing for any length of time (by now, I'm sure you have...) I'm sure you realise that I'm not one to "transmit nulls" - saying something with no meaning wastes your time (listening to it) and my time (saying it.) I don't care to do either.

If you've read the original bit before (the part between the two "SNIPs") then go ahead and skip down the other second SNIP and my comments begin there. That's the closest I'll come to transmitting nulls - I'll give a placeholder to let people know the bit they've probably read before, so they don't have to take too much time getting up to speed. I'm nice like that.

Although, if you'd like to see a simpler version, I'd be interested in your take on it. Clip, snip, and edit - you can either post the results here or PM them to me when you're done - I'm always interested in valid opinions...

5-90
 
you actually expect me to read all that???

fine here is my opinion.........i scrolled down to see how long it was, and at the end i saw something about "the united states military". at that point i pretty much decided it was all Bulls*** anyways.
 
We can always count on Jon to start an interesting conversation. :D

Its a good read, but I have some basic philosophical differences from the writer that prevent me from wholeheartedly accepting his position. As usual, I agree with most of what you have addended as well, Jon.

I guess I'm a sheepdog too, albeit not a law enforcement officer or member of the military. I'm a relatively big guy and I'm trained in a few forms of "aggression management" which comes in handy working with people who exhibit random expressions of violence.

I don't normally carry any weapon other than my wits, but I can use them if I have to. I have to say that my wits have always been my most reliable weapon, and it never ceases to amaze me how foolish some people can be when it comes to letting their guard down. I've seen a few people get hurt directly as a result of relaxed awareness and have had to intervene on several occasions to help prevent someone from getting seriously hurt or killed. Thankfully I haven't been seriously injured as a result of not paying attention (knocking on wood here) and I don't intend to let it happen to me anytime soon.

Although I'm a left-wing liberal, I enthusiastically give support to individual members of law enforcement and the military; just not the whole...
 
scorpio_vette said:
you actually expect me to read all that???

fine here is my opinion.........i scrolled down to see how long it was, and at the end i saw something about "the united states military". at that point i pretty much decided it was all Bulls*** anyways.

Wow, i really do feel sorry for you. And no that has nothing to do with your stance on the United States Military and membership there of, although that did factor in to it, so much as your response to the threads over length and the obvious closed mindedness you displayed in your post. Wow

5-90 As usual, thanks for posting that, repost or not its a good read and should be read often preferably by all, if anything as a reminder.

As for what I am, i would like to think like you I am lethal, although i see that ideal as a constant pursuit. one(individual) may never fully accomplish it as there are those who will be more prepared or lethal and less lethal. i am just somewhere along that road, doing my best to continue on that path while constantly adapting and changing my abilities to better suite the enviroment around me

Grifter.
Grifter
 
Fergie said:
All of you that are too slow to read it, you are the Sheep.
Indeed.

Some days it's hard being a dog.
 
I can go with that.

I try to start decent discussions - you should have heard me dropping bombs in CIS2 (Computers & Society) or ERTW1A (English Writing.) I have done well in the art of the "discussion bomb" - I'd toss out some comment, and it worked like a delayed-action bomb.

Five minutes later, the discussion is centreing around the idea I threw out, and no-one had any idea why (except maybe the instructor...) I just love that!

There's nothing at all wrong with supporting the individuals of an organisation but not supporting the organisation as a whole - morally, philosophically, or ethically.

It's kinda like being anti-war, but supporting the soldiers fighting it. They're not there by choice (largely,) and the two are not mutually exclusive. They're told where to go, and don't have much say in the matter either.

5-90
 
Wow, i really do feel sorry for you. And no that has nothing to do with your stance on the United States Military and membership there of, although that did factor in to it, so much as your response to the threads over length and the obvious closed mindedness you displayed in your post. Wow

to your surprise i will agree with you. but this is how it goes.

i was born and raised in a military family on military bases and then married active duty girl. that's where my reasoning comes from.

the military/government is like jeeps. either you like it or you don't. not to many people have a middle path there.
 
One does not have to support the government to figure out where people fall - I don't. I have long had an argument with the way the government does things - especially since they have a reduced tolerance of "independent sheepdogs" - even though we, as amateurs, usually do the job better than professionials (the only difference between "amateur" and "professional" is a paycheque - often, the amateur is more skilled than the professional.)

I wasn't making a point on government - I was attempting to make a point about people. Be sure to discern the difference there - maybe it makes me an amateur semanticist, but I try to use the language correctly, and that's the best way to confer a meaning. Therefore, you'll also want to understand the way the language is meant to be used, and not the way it is currently used. I'm not saying that you don't, but it is a key point.

Grifter - being "lethal" is not only a state of training, but a state of mind. The very difference between "lethal" and "dangerous" is solely one of control - the fact that people like us are not all the time "dangerous" - but we are dangerous at carefully selected times, and in response to specific circumstances. Just curious - 75th Rangers?

5-90
 
Back
Top