VAhasnoWAVES
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Lake City, Mi
agreed with a lot of this... 4.5" and 33s is the tipping point i feel from budget friendly to expensive.Can you explain the hostility? The OP claims "Until then i will build it and use it for light duty exploration" and I took that as hunting by accident. I've seen more than a few stock cars with very low clearance (my wife's jetta sportwagen is one of them) performing light duty exploration. I'm responding to the OP, not you.
If the OP is like me, he would like to see the money spent go to full use and limiting suspension travel to me is a waste of money. Something I didn't add in my earlier post was that it becomes quite a pain getting in and out once you go 4.5" and 33's and you start to wonder if that's worth the hassle for the next few years while you DD and most likely run fire roads. If I was in his position, I would stay short arms, run a little over stock tire (the 31's that came with rubbed on OE suspension) and bank my cash until I was ready to wheel it. Going that high opens a lot of possible issues up that I recently had to deal with that just aren't there at lower lifts and smaller tires.
yes, you can do it cheap... but hop in someone's jeep the same size who did it right and you will notice a stark difference. my biggest argument against going with 33s would be gearing. stock gearing sucks, plain and simple. its hard on your trans and kills mpg, which means its hard on your wallet.
if the OP cant spring for gears... my suggestion would be to limit himself to 31s, invest in a nice AT, road worthy yet capable offroad, and a budget lift. dont think that will get you where you want to go? install a lunchbox locker in the front and potentially invest in some skids. i think you will be surprised. size isnt everything, especially for the use described.