NAXJA Forums -::- North American XJ Association  

Go Back   NAXJA Forums -::- North American XJ Association > Land Use / Off Topic and other Forums > Land Use Forum
HOME Member FAQ Sponsor Info Rules Bylaws E-Mail

Land Use Forum Information related to Land Use issues, closures, or other information.

Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old October 9th, 2015, 08:24
jeepndel jeepndel is offline
NAXJA Forum User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: N. CA
Posts: 47
ACTION Needed; CA Desert; Messy mixed up issues

ACTION NEEDED in CA desert issues

NOTE: As of today, 10/9/15, there is an OHV friendly legislation in front of Congress, HR 3668 that would create new national OHV recreation areas in the CA desert; yet at the same time, this “monument express” business is going on. Most groups like the 3668 legislation, yet by mixing this Monument (and Antiquities Act and Wilderness Act) in the mix, it's can be confusing. Here is some basic info to help sort this out. Del.

From BlueRibbon Coalition (BRC):
Senator Dianne Feinstein’s (D-CA) dueling plans in Southern California to have Congress pass legislation that includes Wilderness designations and statutory protection for 5 OHV areas vs. having the President designate 1 million acres as a National Monument sans the OHV component is a good example of a new land-use paradigm that Don Amador is calling the “National Monument Express.”

Amador explains more:
“Having watched the National Monument process in various states over the last few years, it is my observation that the environmental movement has created an “either/or” strategy to use the very real threat of a National Monument designation should Congress not act on a proposal.

It appears that in many cases, comprehensive land-use bills that include both Wilderness designations and OHV protections are not moving through Congress. The reality is that when these collaborative bills get stalled in Congress, the proponents ask the President to designate them as a National Monument.

Given the historic paradigm where GOP presidents will not rescind prior National Monument designations nor use the Act to designate pro-access National Monuments, the local user groups are left in a very precarious position where they must try and make lemonade out of political lemons.”

See the letter from Don Amador to the
U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources:

Cal4Wheel (CA4WDA) has a letter generator set up to oppose the inappropriate designation of this massive national monument in CA here:

More from BlueRibbon Coalition here:

ACTION: bottom line is to follow the lead of your own research, and of those organizations you trust to keep up on land use strategies.
Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BRC Action Alert - Stop Closure of Nevada Desert GSequoia SoCal Chapter 4 March 8th, 2015 10:58
BRC Action Alert - Stop Closure of Nevada Desert GSequoia Land Use Forum 0 March 4th, 2015 13:59
Hillz N Hollarz in KY closed (action needed) BlackHole XJ Land Use Forum 17 June 3rd, 2013 13:50
ACTION NEEDED: Rubicon Closure DrvOvrIt Sierra Chapter 11 April 27th, 2009 13:13
LAND USE ACTION NEEDED - Williams V. Gubbins U4WDA Land Use Forum 6 August 14th, 2007 02:04

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 13:28.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
NAXJA and NAXJA logo's Copyright NAXJA. All content/images Copyright NAXJA 1999-2014