![]() |
|
|
Modified Tech Discussion Forum for Tech related discussion for Modified XJ's and MJ's. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Merce-Jeep photos
Hey, finally got around to taking some pics of the mercedes 300 turbo diesel in my MJ. Figured some of you would get a kick out of this......
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by Vee Dubb; May 20th, 2005 at 18:55. Reason: photos |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Merce-Jeep photos
wow that is awesome, what kind of gas mileage are you getting with that.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Merce-Jeep photos
So far, I've been clocking 21mpg average, but that is with 31's, a 4.10 rear, and excessive speeding on the highway.
With a new rear end, smaller tires (dare I say that) and some normal driving, I'm hoping 25 or better. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Merce-Jeep photos
Nice.
How's the rack and pinion working out? |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Merce-Jeep photos
80's model ford mustang r&p. Actually it's doing REAL nice. It makes for a weird ride in the rough stuff, but then again the 3" lift springs are way too stiff. On the highway, though, it rocks.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Merce-Jeep photos
That is for sure very cool...would have expected better milage though..
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Merce-Jeep photos
I'm trying real hard not to say the word "disappointed".
oops. too late. I really did expect something in the 27mpg range. The 300SD sedan the motor and tranny came out of weighs in a half ton more than the MJ. I figured minus 1k lbs, plus 0 aerodynamics, times the tailgate... I'm not sure where I was going with that but yeah, still hoping to achieve atleast 25mpg after the gearing and tire change. This is, afterall, a predominantly on-road truck. Unless it's a long way to the fishing hole. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Merce-Jeep photos
Sweet! first 5 banger XJ I"ve ever seen. Those are great engines, You're running the Merc's tranny?
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Merce-Jeep photos
sweet, i can only imagine th cursing and beer that took to do
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Merce-Jeep photos
Running the merc tranny. I like it so far, just need to build a shifter console for the mercedes shifter, but I need bucket seats for that.
Yeah, cursing and beer. It took several months worth of cursing and beer! Last edited by Vee Dubb; May 20th, 2005 at 21:45. Reason: added content |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Merce-Jeep photos
Quote:
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Merce-Jeep photos
Believe it or not, tho the general consensus agrees with you....
The bump steer is un-noticeable. Quite frankly, I think it's less. The steering is a bit .... <i> different </i> ... but nice and tight otherwise. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Merce-Jeep photos
since it would be impossible to use rack & pinion steering with a solid axle and not have major bump steer, I'll have to assume you don't know what bump steer is.
describe "<i> different </i>" Not trying to be a dick, but if you try to present rack & pinion steering as a viable option, some others may end up wasting a bunch of time and money on something that they will have to end up removing or worse still, will result in dumping the abortion on an ususpecting buyer. Last edited by MaXJohnson; May 21st, 2005 at 05:47. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Merce-Jeep photos
Quote:
actually he wont get bumpsteer, not at least how we with stock style steering are use to it. He will get a change in toe on both tires in opposite directions (mostly toe in on both sides). As his suspension moves the inner tie rods will move in an arch effectively shorten pulling the tire in toward the rack. A traditional inverted y or drag link style is going to move the tires in the same direction (one in, one out, vice-versa), thats what causes bumpsteer. His issue would feel 'different' and will cause weird handling and steering over rough roads compaired to the traditional setup, and eventually wierd tire wear. Probably not 'felt' in the wheel as a kick, or a sudden jerk in a direction like bumpsteer. So, I dont know if you call his bumpsteer, but I guess it could be considered a type. that fab is ugly though. edit: is that rack mounted directly to the axle?? that changes everything.... but I still dont see how this would cause bumpsteer? maybe weird steering wheel movement due to the steering shaft moving with the suspension.... I also just read his other thread....I wasnt taking in the axle shifting due to the trackbar. Im not sure it would move enoough to have a large effect, but if it does the effect would really cause weird changes in toe. Last edited by fordtech; May 21st, 2005 at 06:52. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Merce-Jeep photos
Quote:
In other words, the change in toe of either or both of the wheels resulting from vertical wheel movement is bump-steer. Whether or not this is felt at the steering wheel, and to what extent is not germane to the definition. If we consider your concept of bumpsteer to be correct, we have to assume the SAE is wrong. |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Project jeep of the week | GottaBeJeep | Modified Tech Discussion | 5 | July 18th, 2004 14:32 |
2001 Jeep Wrangler w/33's in PA for sale! | Janster | For Sale: Private Party Only. XJ ITEMS ONLY | 1 | July 1st, 2004 18:06 |
WA: 1990 Jeep Comanche Eliminator < Excellent Condition > | PhatXJ | For Sale: Private Party Only. XJ ITEMS ONLY | 8 | March 18th, 2004 17:55 |
1994 Exocaged Jeep Cherokee | tj00xj91 | For Sale: Private Party Only. XJ ITEMS ONLY | 3 | July 30th, 2003 13:30 |
What did you call my Jeep???!!! | XJguy | Non-Tech / Off Topic | 27 | July 3rd, 2003 22:21 |