In the case of Katrina, "temporary" was "forever". NRA took N.O. to court, and won.
So now all you have to do is present evidence you purchased the weapon, and they will give it back.(to date, no weapons returned)
Prezacktly.
The Social Security Programme was only meant to be "temporary" (a Depression-era stopgap with a five-year concept life. It's been seventy years for a five-year programme more patched than a hippie's jacket, and we wonder why it don't worth worth a bent cent?)
The Federal Income Tax had been implemented during wartime several times - and was temporary each time - until about World War I (or was it WWII? I don't recall, and I don't feel like looking it up at the moment.) Now, the "temporary" Federal Income Tax is "permanent," it's applied wrong according to itself (IIRC, you are subject to
either the Federal
or a State income tax. Meaning, you're only subject to Federal income tax if you live on post, in territories or protectorates, in DC, or you're an American earning money overseas. But, try reading 26CFR sometimes - and people wonder why I want to start deducting booze as a tax preparation expense. Hell - that's the only way that rubbish makes sense!)
Hm - "temporary" being either seventy-five years now, or 90/60 years (depending on when the FITA was "ratified" - even though it was never fully ratified.)
You want to "temporarily" hold my hardware while you get me out? Nah - I'll take me chances and hold on to my gear! If I need to get out, I'll get out under my own steam, and by my own rules. I just can't bring myself to trust someone who isn't willing to trust me...
You want to "temporarily" hold on to my sidearm? Fine - I want a receipt and a $2500 deposit
before I hand it over. Fair enough? Gimme it back, and you'll get your dosh and paper back. I don't get it back inside of a fortnight, and I'll take the money and go buy another one and report the one I handed over as stolen. Not "lost" - "
stolen" - because, as far as I'm concerned, that's exactly what happened.
And it still seems to me that using the Armed Forces for "domestic security" flies in the face of the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 ("domestic security" could be easily interpreted as "police force" or "law enforcement" - and PCA1878 is intended to prevent the US Armed Forces to be used to augment police. The National Guard is in a grey area - if the governor activates it, they can augment state PDs. If the President activates them, PCA1878 applies.)