Yep, some real slow folks there, kinda reminds me of some posts on this board.
Interesting video...Take a good unbiased view of it though and here's a couple of points: This is long, grab a cold one, maybe a sandwich too...
In the 1st half of the video it asked questions about Congressperson and Senators and then compared them to Governor Sarah Palin. Why? The campaign was Senator McCain running against Senator Obama.
I don't know what state that was filmed in, looked upper midwest or east coast due to the brick construction in the background. So if it wasn't filmed in MA, who cares if they know who Congressman Barney Frank is! He represents the people in southern Mass that elected him. Same goes for Congresswoman Pelosi, she represents San Francisco & Marin Counties in California, if you want her out, don't agree with her politics, move here, register and vote her out. Don't like Senator Reid, if you're not a register voter in Nevada there is nothing you can do about it.
I can't tell you each and every Congressperson or Senator, but I can tell you the folks who represent my State and my Congressional District, the rest, not my problem, I can't do anything about it anyhow.
Next: Questions regarding Governor Palin...did the RNC buy her clothes? yes. Is her daughter pregnant? yes.
Then showing the clip with the Russia info...She stated Russia can be seen from Alaska. True. Tina Fey, satirically stated "I can see Russia from my house". The question asked in the video, was spoken different then the subtitles and technically isn't AK her "home"?
The question about the ballots regarding President-elect Obama's 1st election was again written in subtitles different than was asked. The candidate removed ALL competion from his contest, not just those in his party as was asked.
Why do I bring these points up? In my job I need to be as accurate as possible with information or people can get hurt and/or killed. The devil is in the details. Also how you ask a question can control the direction the answer comes from.
Vice President elect Biden states that President elect Obama will be tested within the 1st x-amount of days in office. This is a very true statement. Let's see here's a few examples, 10% of the Nations manufacturing is in the auto industry, the world economy is collapsing, jobs in the U.S. are being lost, Al-Queada has released another video, mushrooms are growing on the international space station... Also things that can't be brought up here in this forum, but are written on yellow and pink paper.
Now the coal statement...I can't say because I do not know enough to make a statement. I use natural gas for heating and cooking and California uses hydro, nuclear, and natural gas for electrical energy production. I can say the statement shown is not long enough to grasp the context.
In conclusion, I made an observation about this past election to a co-worker a few days after the results came in. The church I attend and my social circle are very, very liberal. They believe I am a right winger. The folks I work with for the most part are very conservative and I'm a commie, (not true, I'm more socialist). All the liberal people were always speaking positive about candidate Obama. Their negativity was focused on Governor Sarah Palin, and NOT candiate McCain. The conservatives I spoke with were always focused on negatives about candidate Obama and did not ever speak to the positive of candidate McCain. Why?
Don't buy my last paragraph, it is my opinion & theory that if one was to retrace and review the posts on this board the negative posts about candidate Obama would outnumber the positive posts about candidate McCain by a vast number. With the dark cloud of economic uncertainty hovering above the heads of the American populace, wouldn't voters naturally gravitate towards a positive?
Something to think about.