RichP
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Effort, Pa
-
Welcome to the new NAXJA Forum! If your password does not work, please use "Forgot your password?" link on the log-in page. Please feel free to reach out to [email protected] if we can provide any assistance.
Take the test
- Thread starter RichP
- Start date
SC Rednek
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Winchester TN
I got a 94%. I didn't think that I liked Obama even 6%. Test must be screwed up.
kdailey4315
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Pacifica, CA
94% disagree with Obama. Dammit I was hoping for 100%. I hate that ahole
BIgDaddyChia
RRC Organizer
- Location
- Round Rock, TX
JNickel101
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Alamogordo, NM
I've said it before, and now it is confirmed....
I agree with nothing that man says. 100%
I agree with nothing that man says. 100%
buschwhaked
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Colorado Springs
Breakfast Policy:
Obama has said in the past that he eats babies for breakfast. Do you agree with legislation allowing people to eat babies for breakfast in your home state?
Obama has said in the past that he eats babies for breakfast. Do you agree with legislation allowing people to eat babies for breakfast in your home state?
tbburg
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Scottsdale AZ
I like to eat babes for breakfast, does that count?(and I think it's actually illegal in a couple states!)
JNickel101
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Alamogordo, NM
nope, i'll stick with a protein shake.....those babies are high in cholesterol
But Obama can eat a dozen a day for all I care. Maybe it will make him die quicker.
- Location
- Houston, Tx
You DISAGREED with the Barack Obama position on 40 of the 51 test questions. This means you disagree with the Obama position 78% of the time.
Yep... I'm pretty moderate
Yep... I'm pretty moderate
Mudderoy
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Katy, Texas
I took the test, and passed!
Darky
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- 29 Palms, CA
92%
Ray H
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Falling Waters, WV
I made it through about 30 questions and didnt really care any more.
JNickel101
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Alamogordo, NM
x2 a lot of the questions were retarded - issues that the Fed Gov't shouldn't be concerned about to begin with.
2000xjclassic
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Cleveland Ohio
92%... seems a little low..
Chris
Chris
I thought that too many of the questions were too one sided. #7 for example. It is possible to develop new energy sources and protect the environment @ the same time. One can result in the other. They make it sound as though all new energy sources will be detrimental to the environment.
RichP
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Effort, Pa
I like Obama, he's going to give me EVERYTHING for NOTHING...whooooeeee, what a bargain...
Ray H
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Falling Waters, WV
What is always failed to be mentioned is that all our energy sources CAN be detrimental to the environment. If you really want to get into it, the truth is that PEOPLE are detrimental to the environment. There's many times more land used up every day for housing and factories than 100 new powerplants or nuclear waste disposal areas would use.
tbburg
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Scottsdale AZ
And beavers! Any idea how much flooding is caused by beavers? It's terrible.
Somebody ought to do something. Why can't the feds step in and ban them?(and beavers too):rof:
Ray H
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Falling Waters, WV
Beavers ARE the environment, just ask any greenie.
