TwistedFocus
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- Ohio
I have been doing alot of research and had pretty much decided that the Quadratec Medium Springs sounded like they should be my best option. I have read some conflicting information and wonder if anyone has used them or has any real-world experience with them.
I have a stock 01 XJ and have no immediate plans to lift (maybe a BB down the road) and the rears are saggy. I'm looking for a soft riding OEM replacement, but I often take alot of gear with me on weekend camping trips and could use a little more height and rate in the back for that. A friend of mine has the HDs on his rig and it rides a little stiff for my liking and seems to have limited flex a bit (although that's not that big a deal for my mediocre mall-crawler, mainly the ride quality.)
Standard duty 5.5" arch p/n 56010.10
Medium duty 6.125" arch p/n 56010.12
Heavy duty 7" arch p/n 56010.11
Going by their catalog, I surmised that the mediums would likely ride a bit above stock, being that their arch is about 5/8" higher and presumably somewhat higher rate (although not necessarily). Sounds like it should yield somewhere b/w .5" and .75" above stock and not be as stiff as the HD, assuming the rate is less than the HD and not just an arch height difference. Sounds great, but I have read here and other places that people are saying they are the same as stock on later models.
Does anyone know for sure? I guess I need to call them anyway, but I like to do as much research as possible myself before I make the call to the manufacturer or vendor at least in this case). I'm by no means against the HDs, as I feel they are not a bad choice for me, but I was hoping for a solid "in-between" choice for the sake of ride quality.
Thanks!
I have a stock 01 XJ and have no immediate plans to lift (maybe a BB down the road) and the rears are saggy. I'm looking for a soft riding OEM replacement, but I often take alot of gear with me on weekend camping trips and could use a little more height and rate in the back for that. A friend of mine has the HDs on his rig and it rides a little stiff for my liking and seems to have limited flex a bit (although that's not that big a deal for my mediocre mall-crawler, mainly the ride quality.)
Standard duty 5.5" arch p/n 56010.10
Medium duty 6.125" arch p/n 56010.12
Heavy duty 7" arch p/n 56010.11
Going by their catalog, I surmised that the mediums would likely ride a bit above stock, being that their arch is about 5/8" higher and presumably somewhat higher rate (although not necessarily). Sounds like it should yield somewhere b/w .5" and .75" above stock and not be as stiff as the HD, assuming the rate is less than the HD and not just an arch height difference. Sounds great, but I have read here and other places that people are saying they are the same as stock on later models.
Does anyone know for sure? I guess I need to call them anyway, but I like to do as much research as possible myself before I make the call to the manufacturer or vendor at least in this case). I'm by no means against the HDs, as I feel they are not a bad choice for me, but I was hoping for a solid "in-between" choice for the sake of ride quality.
Thanks!
Last edited: