wolfpackjeeper
NAXJA Forum User
- Location
- 500' and 500KCAS, RAF lakenheath
1989 MJ, 4cyl, man, 2wd, shortbed
So it appears as though the manifold on the 4cyl models was a wet setup. I presume to aid in cold weather startup and running. I know on late model GMs the throttle body was wet for the same reasons. The waterneck and heater valve look just like a 4.0 so I was considering deleting the flow through the intake manifold. It was 85deg down here before it hit 10:00 so if cold starts are the reason for this I see no reason not to. I am wondering if there is a good reason not to, other than "the factory designed it that way" I figured it might go a bit towards cooling the intake air charge.
Thoughts?
So it appears as though the manifold on the 4cyl models was a wet setup. I presume to aid in cold weather startup and running. I know on late model GMs the throttle body was wet for the same reasons. The waterneck and heater valve look just like a 4.0 so I was considering deleting the flow through the intake manifold. It was 85deg down here before it hit 10:00 so if cold starts are the reason for this I see no reason not to. I am wondering if there is a good reason not to, other than "the factory designed it that way" I figured it might go a bit towards cooling the intake air charge.
Thoughts?