![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Land Use Forum Information related to Land Use issues, closures, or other information. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest's Draft EIS
http://www.ashlandwi.com/placed/inde...89&refer_url=-
Forest Service seeks comment on management plan By CLAUDIA CURRAN The Daily Press Last Updated: Tuesday, May 20th, 2003 09:16:35 AM U.S. Forest Service timber management practices and all-terrain vehicle (ATV) regulations on the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest (CNNF) are slated for changes likely to occur by the end of 2003. The changes, among many others, would come if Forest Service officials adopt a revision of the CNNF's current forest management plan, which was approved 17 years ago. "It's really more of a refinement of the old plan," said Sally Hess-Samuelson, CNNF planner. More timber management zoning and attention to overall forest species composition is included in the proposed revision, Hess-Samuelson said. Of eight proposals in a draft environmental impact statement of the revision, the Forest Service's preferred alternative shifts timber emphasis from early successional and even-aged northern hardwood tree species, such as aspen, oak and pine, to a more uneven-aged mix of hardwoods and aspen. Such a change would leave about 29 percent of forest upland with aspen trees after 10 years, comparable to current CNNF practices. One hundred years from now, though, the situation may change: the proposal estimates 20 percent of forest upland would contain aspen in contrast to about 24 percent were current forest practices followed. This possibility is of concern to the Ruffed Grouse Society. In his testimony before a subcommittee of the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources in 2000, Daniel Dessecker, a senior wildlife biologist with the Ruffed Grouse Society, described the impact of switching from even-aged to more uneven-aged timber management practices in eastern national forests. "Unless these habitats are replaced through the thoughtful implementation of even-age forest management practices, viable populations of ruffed grouse and other wildlife dependent upon young forest habitats will become increasingly imperiled," Dessecker wrote. However, if the Forest Service manages timber solely for game species such as ruffed grouse or deer, it would do so at the exclusion of other species, said Jim Meeker, associate professor of natural resources and biology at Northland College and a member of Conservation Biologists of the Upper Great Lakes (CBUGL). "The big problem is, we don't manage on a large enough scale," Meeker said. Without large-scale management over the next 100 years, Meeker predicts a decrease in native interior forest plant populations, including plants such as orchids and trilliums, and a decrease in conifer species such as cedar, hemlock and white pine. Meeker's preferred CNNF plan alternative would allow for larger blocks of interior forest where select timber cuts would be made when logged and less aspen would grow. "It's a matter of stepping back and managing the forest differently," Meeker said. If the Forest Service adopts its proposed alternative little change would be seen in the Washburn Ranger District as the bulk of trees in the district are conifers, not hardwoods, according to District Ranger Chris Worth. But in the Great Divide District, Barry Paulson, district ranger, said long-term changes with the proposal include a higher level of emphasis on northern hardwood management and a decrease in aspen cover. "I suspect a lot of folks over a 5, 10, or 50-year period won't see changes that are very dramatic," he said. Unless the Forest Service changes its forest plan policy, the revised plan will be reviewed by the agency in 10-15 years, when adjustments could again be made, he added. ATV regulations Proposed CNNF plan changes would significantly alter the forest's ATV regulations. "The change in proposed ATV policy would be pretty broad sweeping," said Worth. Under current regulations, ATV riders can hop on their machines and ride on trails, connectors between trails and routes, or roads. Other than where signs prohibit off-road travel, ATV riders are also currently able to go off-trail and off-road. Proposed changes to ATV policy would restrict travel to trails and roads and only allow ventures off-road "if a sign says you can be there," Hess-Samuelson said. More trails would be available on the Chequamegon from between September 1 to December 15, up to 50 miles of connectors could be established on both the Chequamegon and Nicolet forests, and up to 35 miles of a loop trail could be built on the Nicolet. The CNNF's past liberal ATV policy has resulted in resource damage, said Worth, who said the proposed changes are beneficial and "warranted for the protection of resources." Motivating the agency's proposed changes was resource damage. Dr. Thomas Rooney of the Department of Botany at University of Wisconsin-Madison recently completed a study about off-road vehicles (ORVs) and non-native plants. The study was conducted in the CNNF and is scheduled for presentation at a Natural Areas Association meeting in September. After collecting mud and seeds from ORVs, Rooney modeled dispersal patterns and showed that the probable spread of exotic, or non-native plant species increases with ORV travel. "Eliminating ORVs from natural areas is the most effective strategy for stopping the introduction of exotics," reads Rooney's abstract. In addition, "over time, with many, many users, the action of the tires tends to dig into the soil," creating ditches, ravines and requiring rehabilitation, Hess-Samuelson said. Jim Nemec, president of the Chequamegon ATV Club, is concerned with the Forest Service's proposal and the implications it may have on the area's recreation-based economy. "I'd like to see them keep the roads open," Nemec said. "I would like to see them leave the policy so that the forest is open to ATVs unless areas are posted closed." Even within the ATV community, though, opinions vary. Vernon Moore, a member of the Price County ATV Trails Association and Northwoods Range Rovers ATV club, blames a minority of ATV users for causing resource damage and agrees with the Forest Service limiting ATV travel to trails. "It doesn't bother me that they're requiring us to go on trails," Moore said. "In fact, they should." However, his agreement with the agency's plan partners with the development of continuous ATV trails in Price County and an increase in the number of trail connectors. "I would like to see more mileage," Moore said. "Enough to get the job done-whatever that is." •••••• Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest's Draft Environmental Impact Statement and summary is available on the forest's website: http://www.fs.fed.us/r9/cnnf/. Copies of the proposed forest plan revision are also available from: Forest Plan Revision, Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, 68 S. Stevens St., Rhinelander, WI 54501; by e-mail at r9_cheni_lmp@fs.fed.us; by phone in Rhinelander at (715) 362-1300 or in Park Falls at (715) 762-2461; or in person between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at forest service offices at 68 S. Stevens St., Rhinelander, WI and 1170 Fourth Avenue South, Park Falls, WI. However you make your revision request, please specify whether you'd like a CD or a hard copy of the document. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++ NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
__________________
is more than quality web forums and organized events, support the collective XJ/MJ voice and join the club.Happy Trails! Ed A. Stevens |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| (WI) Nicolet National Forests Revised Land and Resource Management Plan | Ed A. Stevens | Land Use Forum | 0 | 07-11-2003 09:44 |
| (WY) Medicine Bow-Routt National Forests and Thunder Basin National Grassland... | Ed A. Stevens | Land Use Forum | 0 | 06-13-2003 00:19 |
| (CO) DMRP EIS Gunnison Gorge National Conservation Area | Ed A. Stevens | Land Use Forum | 0 | 03-20-2003 11:32 |
| (NV) Draft EIS for the Black Rock Desert-High Rock Canyon Emigrant Trails... | Ed A. Stevens | Land Use Forum | 1 | 03-20-2003 10:56 |
| Draft Recovery Plan for Population Segments of Bull Trout | Ed A. Stevens | Land Use Forum | 0 | 02-21-2003 22:42 |