• Welcome to the new NAXJA Forum! If your password does not work, please use "Forgot your password?" link on the log-in page. Please feel free to reach out to [email protected] if we can provide any assistance.

(wy) Comments Needed On Medicine Bow Nat. Forest!

Ed A. Stevens

NAXJA Member
NAXJA Member
The Medicine Bow National Forest in Southeast Wyoming is undergoing a Forest Plan Revision. The Draft Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement have been released and the USFS is accepting public comment until April 4, 2003. This forest includes premier snowmobile and hunting areas such as the Snowy Range and the Sierra Madres near Laramie, Saratoga and Rawlins. This is the last chance we have to protect recreational interests on this Forest.

A local pro-recreation and access group, "Recreationist of The Bow" (www.recreationist.org [email protected]), needs your help to support recreation and multiple use on the Medicine Bow National Forest. Comment letters are urgently needed.

In the draft documents, the Forest Service selected a Preferred Alternative (Alternative D) that will be detrimental to recreation on the Medicine Bow National Forest, especially to snowmobiling, mountain biking and OHV use. Additionally, this Preferred Alternative places a major emphasis on restoring natural processes, threatened and endangered species and their habitats. Multiple Use management will take a back seat to the "Green" management method of locking the gate and keeping everybody out.

Here are some notable items in the Draft Plan:

* Doubles the acres Wilderness on the 1.1 million acre forest from ~80,000 (7%) to ~150,000 (14%)

* Primary emphasis is on non-motorized recreation winter and summer

* Eliminates 30% of all existing areas open to snowmobile recreation

* Restricts snowmobiles to designated routes on 10% of remaining areas open to snowmobile use

* An aggressive road closure schedule to closes tens of miles of road each year

* Allows "natural processes" to take precedence on almost oneself of forest lands

* Gives precedence to threatened and endangered species over game animal habitat and human use

* Reduces timber harvest by 30%

The local and national Green groups are hard at work with letter campaigns, rallies and door-to-door solicitation to get the Plan changed to reflect their ideas, which in short are a textbook implementation of the Wildlands project). We need to combat these environmental and anti-recreation interests and let the USFS know that we have a voice.

Support from all recreationists in all areas is needed to amend this biocentric Draft Plan to one that will support recreation and continue the Forest Service's mandate of multiple use. The USFS wants SPECIFIC comments on the draft plan. A comment letter is the proper way to make these comments. In you letter please let the USFS know that you recreate or wish to be able to recreate on the Medicine Bows in the future. If you have visited, please tell the USFS where you recreate and what types of recreation you participate in.

Your comment letter should also include the following speaking points:

* Additional wilderness is not needed on the MBNF. Currently 7% of the forest is Wilderness and 14% of all non-motorized trails are in wilderness areas. Current areas more than support the 2.5% of forest visitors desiring a wilderness experience. The Preferred Alternative should be changed such that all areas proposed as "recommended wilderness" with Management Area 1.2 must be managed as Area 3.31 which is a back country recreation area supporting snowmobiling, OHV and mountain bike use. The proposed Rock Creek Wilderness closes tens of miles of the most technical mountain bike trails on the forest, closes traditional OHV routes and eliminates snowmobile use. Additionally this area land locks thousands of acres open to motorized recreation as the only access would be through private lands. The proposed Laramie Peak/Ashenfelder Wilderness closes the largest contiguous block of USFS land in the Laramie Peak Unit. This is significant in an area where much of the USFS land is inaccessible since it is surrounded by private land. This proposed are also includes one of the only designated OHV routes on the entire forest.

* Primary winter recreation emphasis should be on snowmobiling as snowmobiles are the vast majority of winter users and make up 13% of all yearly forest visitors with 382,000 visitor days. Further restrictions on snowmobile use and areas will have a negative impact on surrounding communities. Snowmobiling contributes $31.2 million dollars in annual traveler spending to surrounding counties (14% of all yearly travel spending), supports 813 jobs with $8.7 million in labor earnings and generates $2 million in tax revenue. The Forest Service should manage the forest to benefit the majority of users. The forest service should full utilize the 2000-2001 Wyoming Snowmobile Survey in its analysis to support the management of winter resources for the primary enjoyment of snowmobilers. The Preferred Alternative should be amended to place it primary winter emphasis on snowmobiling followed by downhill skiing (the second most popular use of the forest in winter).

* Snowmobile use, especially off-trail riding, is a proper and responsible use of the forest. There is no social, economic or scientific reason to restrict snowmobiles only to designated routes on any area of the forest with the exception of big game winter range and current wilderness areas. The plan should be amended such that all Area 3.5 Limited Management Areas are changed to Area 3.31 or Area 5.4 that support off-trail snowmobiling. The Plan should also specifically state the off-trail riding is a proper and responsible use of the forest.

* The availability of summer opportunities for OHV users is virtually nonexistent and the Plan makes no attempt to improve recreation for these visitors. 273 miles of trails are currently available for non-motorized use and only a few miles of designated motorized trails exists. The number of acres of Area 3.31 that support motorized recreation are not nearly adequate to accommodate the growing number of summer OHV users. This need will only grow as the State of Wyoming's OHV program prospers. The Preferred Alternative should be amended to increase the acres of Area 3.31 available for motorized use. Additionally, the description of Area 3.31 should be changed to encourage trail building rather than just tolerate it. Enough roads have been eliminated already and no more roads should be closed without absolute proof that they are causing irreversible resource damage and are of no benefit to Recreationists on the Forest. Roads are essential to recreational access and access for the elderly and disabled.

* This Preferred Alternative contributes to the trend of converting multiple use lands to limited-use lands without need or justification. Therefore, 100% of the MBNF lands remaining outside of currently designated wilderness and big game range must be managed for multiple-use in order to avoid further contributing to the excessive allocation of resources and recreation opportunities for exclusive non-motorized use. Any "specific" non-motorized areas should be limited and be immediately adjacent to parking areas and trailheads.

* The allowable sale quantity (ASQ) of timber available on the forest should be maintained at current levels and the Plan should require that this much timber be sold from the forest during the duration of the Plan. The USFS should recognize that the timber available directly impacts the economies of surrounding communities and gives hundreds of people jobs.

* Monitoring and Evaluation guidelines and projects should be included in the Plan and conducted to determine the need for infrastructure improvements and site specific projects that will improve snowmobiling, OHV and mountain bike use on the MBNF, such as additional trails, parking areas, warming huts and sanitary facilities.

You must include your name, complete address and signature. You should mail your letter to the following address and it MUST BE POSTMARKED BY APRIL 4, 2003 TO BE CONSIDERED:

Medicine Bow-Routt National Forests
ATTN: Draft Forest Plan Revision Comments
2468 Jackson St.
Laramie, WY 82070
Fax: 307-745-2398
Email: [email protected]
Internet: www.fs.fed.us/r2/mbr

Thank you for your support of recreation. With your help, we can continue to see that the natural resources of the Medicine Bow National Forest are managed and protected FOR the public rather than being protected FROM the public.
 
------ SAMPLE LETTER ------

Thank you for your support of recreation. With your help, we can continue to see that the natural resources of the Medicine Bow National Forest are managed and protected FOR the public rather than being protected FROM the public.

------ SAMPLE LETTER ------
(This one is geared towards snowmobilers who know the area)

Dear Medicine Bow Planning Team:

I would like to express my opinion of your Preferred Alternative D. This plan has the potential to severely damage recreation opportunities and the businesses that rely on recreational tourism. The winter sport of snowmobiling, which contributes over $31 million dollars to local economies, will be negatively impacted by this Plan. The USFS must use the 2000-2001 Wyoming Snowmobile Survey in their economic and social analysis of the impacts of implementing Alternative D.

The "recommended wilderness" areas (MAP 1.2 areas) are not needed in a forest where only 3 percent of the people coming to the forest ever enter wilderness. These areas should be managed for back country recreation using MAP 3.31. The proposed MAP 3.5 areas are a deliberate and unjustified attempt to hurt snowmobiling. Please manage these areas in a manner that allows off-trail snowmobiling to continue. One of the primary reasons I ride in the Snowy Range and the Sierra Madres is the freedom and thrill of off trail riding especially in the areas of Turpin Reservoir, Singer and Bridger Peaks. These areas receive some of the heaviest snowfalls in the mountains and snowmobiles in these areas pose no threats to plants, wildlife or their habitats. I strongly object to these MAP 3.5 areas! The only non-motorized areas that should even be considered are the ones easily accessible to non motorized users and located adjacent to trailheads.

It is plans like this that make people lose respect for any forest service decisions, good or bad. As much as people like to see wildlife, the forest should be managed for the enjoyment of people first. People and animals can co-exist in the forest without destroying businesses and recreational opportunities. It is my hope that the Forest Service will change the above mentioned Management Area Prescriptions to protect our resources without eliminating any recreational opportunities, especially off-trail snowmobiling. The Plan should also be flexible enough to support infrastructure improvements such as larger parking lots and additions to our snowmobile trail systems. I also believe enough roads have been eliminated and no more roads should be closed without absolute proof that they are causing irreversible damage and are of no benefit to Recreationists on the Forest. Roads are essential to recreational access and access for the elderly and disabled.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this issue.

Sincerely,
Name,
Address, City, State, Zip
Signature
 
Medicine Bow plan has foes


http://www.billingsgazette.com/inde.../2003/04/04/build/wyoming/34-medicine-bow.inc


Medicine Bow plan has foes

LARAMIE, Wyo. (AP) -- Snowmobilers, mountain bikers, loggers, ranchers
and others
gathered to protest plans to change the management of Medicine Bow
National Forest.

The protesters Tuesday spoke out against how the U.S. Forest Service
wants to reduce
mechanized recreation, logging and cattle grazing in the forest.

Bill Erickson, of Saratoga, said that since the draft of the forest's
preferred alternative was
released, a Louisiana Pacific sawmill closed and the town lost 200 jobs.

"We have no mills. All the loggers have left," he said.

Forest spokeswoman Lynn Jackson countered that forest officials are in
fact interested in
keeping the logging industry active in the forest.

"We can't do our management unless we have purchasers for our timber,"
she said.

She said the views of the protesters, who were organized by a group
called Recreationists of the
Bow, will be taken into consideration before a final decision is made,
probably in December.

Friday is the deadline for submitting public comments on the plan.

The protesters' vehicles extended a city block and included logging
trucks and trailers carrying
snowmobiles. The protesters parked in front of a U.S. Forest Service
office outside town.

Some of their signs read, "Wilderness, Land of No Uses," "Save Our Out
of Work Logger," and
"Mountain Bikes Can't Ride Wilderness."

The protesters presented Jackson with a cardboard box they said
contained more than 1,200
postcards protesting the plan. Jackson said if the postcards all say the
same thing they will be
counted as one statement and urged the protesters to submit their
particular objections in writing.

The U.S. Forest Service preferred alternative, chosen from eight
proposals, calls for setting
aside an additional 60,834 acres, or 6 percent of the forest, as
wilderness. Medicine Bow
National Forest currently has four wilderness areas totaling 78,301
acres.

Roy De Vries, of Laramie, who described himself as a snowmobiler,
camper, hiker and skier,
said the protesters' views were not heeded during the preparation of the
draft plan. "We feel that
you have not listened to us," he told Jackson.

Korey Kreitman, of Centennial, stood beside his mountain bike and said,
"We feel the Forest
Service has been pressured by minority groups that have a tremendous
amount of money. The
Forest Service needs to represent the greatest number of people that use
the forest." He drew a
round of applause.

Other protesters said ranchers are losing grazing ground as wilderness
areas are expanded.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
 
Back
Top