• Welcome to the new NAXJA Forum! If your password does not work, please use "Forgot your password?" link on the log-in page. Please feel free to reach out to [email protected] if we can provide any assistance.

slotted rotors and ceramic pads

Ceramic pads are for race cars where the brakes heat up like mad. You will never reach their peak operating temp so they will suck on your jeep. There are "high performance" pads out there that are the carbon metallic construction that do not need excessive heat to work. Look into Hawk, Black Magic, or EBC.

As for slotted or drilled rotors, there is a big debate on the effectiveness of them for our application. However, i have drilled rotors on my 01 and they seem much more grabby. And i will be using them from now on.
 
drilled and slotted rotors lets water and other gunk into the slots making them not as effective. so for low speed and large tires, more surface area on the rotor for the caliper to grab the better. just my .02
 
Ceramic pads are for race cars where the brakes heat up like mad
Err.. no. Ceramic pads are found on many road cars, and many vehicles come stock with them. They dust less. But I wouldn't recommend them. Get a good set of semi-metalic pads.

drilled and slotted rotors lets water and other gunk into the slots making them not as effective.
Slotted rotors aren't bad about getting dirt in the slots. The drilled ones are. Drilled also has a tendency to develop micro cracks around the holes. Plus it turns your rotor into swiss cheese, decreasing brake rotor surface.
 
Err.. no. Ceramic pads are found on many road cars, and many vehicles come stock with them. They dust less. But I wouldn't recommend them. Get a good set of semi-metalic pads.

Slotted rotors aren't bad about getting dirt in the slots. The drilled ones are. Drilled also has a tendency to develop micro cracks around the holes. Plus it turns your rotor into swiss cheese, decreasing brake rotor surface.

My point was that they are not the best option for what he wants.

As far as less surface area on the drilled rotors that would be a good point if the holes don't act like lots of biting edges. look at the style of rotor all the desert racers are using, now that is Swiss cheese! But they still use them for some reason.

All I know is my experience, I've had solid ones and drilled ones both with the same cheap metallic pads and the drilled ones are much better.

Maybe we should put a drilled one on the drivers side and a solid one on the passenger side and see if the Jeep pulls to one side. Haha

PS, see what I mean about a lot of debate on the subject? Lol
 
My point was that they are not the best option for what he wants.

As far as less surface area on the drilled rotors that would be a good point if the holes don't act like lots of biting edges. look at the style of rotor all the desert racers are using, now that is Swiss cheese! But they still use them for some reason.

All I know is my experience, I've had solid ones and drilled ones both with the same cheap metallic pads and the drilled ones are much better.

Maybe we should put a drilled one on the drivers side and a solid one on the passenger side and see if the Jeep pulls to one side. Haha

PS, see what I mean about a lot of debate on the subject? Lol


Man you are just FULL of mis-information about this subject aren't you?

I'm not getting into another drilled/slotted/solid debate with anybody but DON'T LISTEN TO THIS MAN!
 
Err.. no. Ceramic pads are found on many road cars, and many vehicles come stock with them.

I thought you were gunna beat me to the punch but ya didn't quite get there.

Ceramic pads are for race cars where the brakes heat up like mad. You will never reach their peak operating temp so they will suck on your jeep.

Just because they're called ceramic pads, doesn't mean they're a 100% ceramic compound. Aside from actual race vehicles, most ceramic pads have just a portion of ceramic actually in the compound. In other words, how you described them is pretty inaccurate.

However, how well they would work in a Jeep for the purposes the OP is looking for - I'm not even gunna pretend to know. I would suspect that they would be no worse than metallic or semi-metallic pads, but that for the money you may be better off with cheaper pads.
 
Ceramic pads are not found on high heat conditions. They have a tendency to glaze over.

Drilled/Slotted rotors were designed in the 70's because they were unable to release the gasses when the pads gassed out. The only reason cross drilled/slotted are seen in performance applications is because it looks cool. Perception vs reality.

*Edit* Here is a decent article I found years ago about brakes
Explanation of Cross Drilled Rotors

Separating fact from fiction



I and many of my autocrossing and road racing friends have been trying to separate the marketing hype from the product and explain the existence of Eradispeeds or any cross drilled and/or slotted brake rotors. Mostly, there seems to be a misunderstanding of the reasons for drilling holes in a perfectly good rotor. Cross drilled rotors have somehow become the "magical cure" for your brakes. Many would like you to believe that they will help you stop faster, they will wear better, stay cooler, and they can magically avoid warping. Unfortunately all of these things are false. But, since the guys who make these products spend more on advertising than I do (ok, I don't), it is easy to fall into that trap.



Broken down to the most basic physics (don't worry, no serious math involved here). You will begin to see the reasons they can't do the things they are touted to do.



The "basic" lesson:

Ok. If I am trying to boil a pot of water with 2 gallons of water in it. It will take a lot of heat to get all of that water up to boiling temperature. Right? Now, if I remove 1/2 the water and with it, 1/2 the mass used to absorb heat, it will now be easier to get that water to boil since there is less mass to absorb heat. Make sense?

Ok, If I take a 3 lb chunk of metal and a 6 lb chunk of metal and set them both over a small torch, which one do you think will heat up first? The lighter mass will see a more rapid temperature rise (it will get hotter, quicker). Correct?

Now, if I take a brake rotor that weighs 20 lbs and begin making "panic stops" with it, it's temperature will increase. Easy enough.

If I now take the same rotor, drill holes in it reducing its weight to 17 lbs and make the same "panic stops", would it not make sense (from the above examples) that the lighter rotor will end that stop with a higher temperature? Less mass to absorb heat will cause a more rapid temperature rise.

Many will say "cross drilled rotors cool better". Hmmm. If you really look at it, how much air do you think can blow through those little holes? Add the fact that they are spinning at a reasonably high speed and the cooling argument becomes even less believable. In fact, the holes could, in theory, disrupt the natural draw of air from the center of the rotor to the outside edge. That is the flow that actually cools the rotors.

Now, some of the aftermarket drilled/slotted rotors are in fact heavier than the stock parts they replace. That is good for heat absorbtion, but you still have the problem of "holes". Where there is a hole in the rotor surface, there is no friction. So, the effect is similar to reducing the size of the brake pad because less of it can touch the rotor (to make friction) at any given time.



This is from Baer racing (I don't think it is on their site any longer).

From Baer Brake Systems
What are the benefits to Crossdrilling, Slotting, and Zinc-Washing my rotors?
In years past, crossdrilling and/or Slotting the rotor for racing purposes was beneficial by providing a way to expel the gasses created when the bonding agents employed to manufacture the pads began to break down at extreme temperatures. This condition is often referred to as “green pad fade” or “outgassing”. When it does occur, the driver still has a good firm brake pedal, but simply little or no friction. Since this normally happens only at temperatures witnessed in racing, this can be very exciting!

However, with today’s race pad technology, ‘outgassing’ is no longer much of a concern. When shopping for races pads, or even ultra-high performance road pads, look for the phrases, “dynamic surface treatment”, “race ready”, and/or, “pre-burnished”. When these or similar statements are made by the pad manufacturer, the pad in question will likely have little or no problem with ‘outgassing’. Ironically more pedestrian pads used on most streetcars will still exhibit ‘outgassing’, but only when used at temperatures normally only encountered on the racetrack.

Although crossdrilling and/or slotting will provide a welcome path to expend any gasses when and if they develop, it is primarily a visual enhancement behind today’s often wide-open wheel designs.

Crossdrilling offers the greatest gas relief pathway, but creates potential “stress risers” from which cracks can occur. Baer’s rotors are cast with crossdrilling in mind, from the material specified, to curved vanes, behind which the holes are placed to minimize potential crack migration. Slotted surfaces are what Baer recommends for track only use. Slotted only rotors are offered as an option for any of Baer’s offerings.

From Brembo:


From Brembo
Why use drilled or slotted discs?
Drilling or slotting discs aids the disc in several ways:
The edges of the slots or holes continuously clean and refresh the pad surface as well as providing increased brake "bite". Additionally, they prevent gasses from collecting between the pad and disc interface.
The disc is lightened, thereby decreasing its rotational inertia.
Improved ventilation increases the disc's ability to shed heat, resulting in cooler operating temperatures.

Wilwood:

From Wilwood
Q: Why are some rotors drilled or slotted?
A: Rotors are drilled to reduce rotating weight, an issue near and dear to racers searching for ways to minimize unsprung weight. Drilling diminishes a rotor's durability and cooling capacity.

Slots or grooves in rotor faces are partly a carryover from the days of asbestos pads. Asbestos and other organic pads were prone to "glazing" and the slots tended to help "scrape or de-glaze" them. Drilling and slotting rotors has become popular in street applications for their pure aesthetic value. Wilwood has a large selection of drilled and slotted rotors for a wide range of applications.

And Stoptech:


Discs that have been drilled through with a non-intersecting pattern of radial holes. The objects are to provide a number of paths to get rid of the boundary layer of out gassed volatiles and incandescent particles of friction material and to increase "bite" through the provision of many leading edges. The advent of carbon metallic friction materials with their increased temperatures and thermal shock characteristics ended the day of the drilled disc in professional racing. They are still seen (mainly as cosmetic items) on motorbikes and some road going sports cars. Typically in original equipment road car applications these holes are cast then finished machined to provide the best possible conditions by which to resist cracking in use. But they will crack eventually under the circumstances described in another section (see Cracking). Properly designed, drilled discs tend to operate cooler than non-drilled ventilated discs of the same design due the higher flow rates through the vents from the supplemental inlets and increased surface area in the hole. That's right, inlets. The flow is into the hole and out through the vent to the OD of the disc. If discs are to be drilled, the external edges of the holes must be chamfered (or, better yet, radiused) and should also be peened.



The reason:

Rotors were originally drilled to eliminate something known as "green fade". The best way to explain "Green fade" is to relate it to an air hockey table. The puck is suspended on a cushion of air that prevents it from touching the table, this reduces the friction between the puck and the table.
A long time ago, pads were made with the best resins we had available. Many of those resins would produce gas as they cured. When a pad was used the first few times, the heat would "cure" the resin which would cause it to produce vapors. This was known as "out gassing". The vapors would build up between the pad and the rotor and lift or "force" the pad away from the rotor (like the puck in air hockey). This caused the brakes to be very ineffective, even though they were not yet at the maximum rated operating temperature. The holes were drilled to allow that gas a place to escape. So, it is correct to say that rotors were cross drilled to eliminate fade, but not for the reasons you would think. The good news is that today's resins no longer suffer from these problem and the modern race pads are so good that this is really no longer an issue. So, by cross drilling rotors, you will only manage to shorten the lifespan of that rotor (it now has less surface area to wear against the brake pad and will wear more quickly as well as a reduction in weight that will cause the brakes to operate at a higher temperature).

Another problem with cross drilled rotors is the potential for cracking around the holes. The holes become a stress point in the cast iron that can more readily allow cracks to form in the rotor surface. This requires that you pay close attention to the rotor surface for signs of cracking. Some small cracks, known as "surface checking" are acceptable, but anything that resembles a crack would be a reason to replace that rotor. When looking at slotted rotors keep in mind that the slots should not be milled off of the edge of the rotor. This is a great place for cracks to form, and they will. The slot should be ball milled in the rotor face and originate and terminate on the surface of the rotor without exiting the rotors edge. The goal is to eliminate sharp edges that cause stress risers on the rotor surface. This will reduce the possibility of cracking. If you see slotted rotors with slots that are milled off the edge of the rotor, shop for another brand. Slots that are not cut through the edge of the rotor are a good sign that the manufacturer of that rotor knows what they are doing. This is a good indicator of parts made by a brake company and not a machine shop that happens to drill and slot rotors.

Many years ago, when I ordered my first brake kit from Baer Racing, they told me that drilled rotors would typically last 20% less than an equivalent solid rotor. This was why they always recommended solid rotors for extreme use. Baer has changed their stance on this since discovering there was a large amount of money to be made selling "Eradispeeds" (they are very pretty brake rotors). This change in their marketing strategy has caused me to feel that they have gone from "supporting the racing community" to "making maximum money". And, I guess I can't blame them.....

If you are truly looking for upgraded braking performance for your car. I suggest, as a first upgrade, that you leave the stock size rotors and upgrade the pads. Try a set of Hawk HPS pads or something from Larry at Carbotech Engineering (http://www.carbotecheng.com) <http://www.carbotecheng.com)>. You'll think you put "big brakes" on all 4 corners (compared to stock).

If you must go bigger, look at any of the various brake upgrades available from many major manufacturers. Brembo, Baer, and many others will have what you need, if you need to upgrade. There are larger kits and they increase in both cost and braking ability. Only your needs and your budget are the limit.

Tires:

I'd also like to take a moment to address the impact that tires have on braking performance.

While it is true that the tires have the "last word" with the pavement when it comes to how the car accelerates, turns, and brakes. There are a few things that tires can and can't do. While it is true that a car on wide, sticky tires should and will out brake the same car on thin, non-grippy tires (all other things being equal). And, while tires are extremely important. They become less important on the 5th or 8th stop or the 3rd lap of a road course. By then the brakes (depending on rotor size, cooling, pads, etc) may be so hot that they can't lock up the skinny little tires, much less the wide, grippy ones. This is where upgrading the brakes pays dividends. This is not meant to minimize the tires role in braking performance. Simply, you must remember to weigh the tires limits against the brake systems limits. You are working with a "package" and changes in one can impact the other. So, while tires will be the limit on the first few stops, they will play a less important role as the brake system temperatures increase. Remember, just because you can lock up the tires on the first stop does not mean that you can't benefit from brake system upgrades.


Class dismissed.

Have fun!



The abbreviated version:

For those who want the short version.

Eradispeeds will not slow your car down any better than stock rotors. They are built to look pretty in the driveway. Iron has a very similar coefficient of friction and it is all about the same. A rotor only has so much metal in it. Metal absorbs heat, metal with holes in it, is lighter than metal without, this makes it lighter, this will allow it to absorb less heat. So, you will not see any miracles from a set of Eradispeeds. Catchy name, shiny parts, great marketing, but they are still "just rotors". Pads...the pads will make a difference (and for much less money). Rotors are still a wear item, and for the money they are asking, I'd hate to run aggressive pads that chew up rotors on slotted, drilled or Eradispeed rotors. However, those same upgraded pads will stop your car and very well. So, I'd buy $60 rotors and $100 pads, instead of $20 pads and $800 rotors. You'll be happier with the result.

Be safe!
 
Man you are just FULL of mis-information about this subject aren't you?

I'm not getting into another drilled/slotted/solid debate with anybody but DON'T LISTEN TO THIS MAN!

x2
 
I stuck Powerstop slotted rotors and Hawk brake pads on my TJ years ago and it was the best brake upgrade I've ever done. The stopping was improved dramatically with 33" tires. Never was able to skid to a stop till that day.

Amazing combo.

But remember, no brake pad/rotor will do much good if your brake system is in poor condition. Make sure the brakes are properly bled with fresh fluid and calipers/drums are functioning as they should. I've seen alot of cases where people complain that their brakes suck but do not realize that their rear brakes aren't adjusted or helping the fronts at all.
 
I put some "ceramic" pads on my rig a few years ago. Didn't stop any better than before, and squeaked a hell of a lot more. No matter how many times I machined the rotors/re-scuffed the pads. Stick with something tried and true.
 
My point was that they are not the best option for what he wants.

As far as less surface area on the drilled rotors that would be a good point if the holes don't act like lots of biting edges. look at the style of rotor all the desert racers are using, now that is Swiss cheese! But they still use them for some reason.

All I know is my experience, I've had solid ones and drilled ones both with the same cheap metallic pads and the drilled ones are much better.

Maybe we should put a drilled one on the drivers side and a solid one on the passenger side and see if the Jeep pulls to one side. Haha

PS, see what I mean about a lot of debate on the subject? Lol

I never liked the idea of "Racers use it so it has to be good." argument. Race teams are out to advertise products to get people to buy them, they don't necessarily use something because of performance. Also weight is a factor in racing, shaving weight from rotating mass by reducing stopping power might fit well into their plan. Longevity, something race teams don't usually care about. Having to replace these super special race parts after each race to them is not a big deal where on a street car that becomes a problem.

Before the argument is made that modern supercars use rotors with holes in them comes up. There is a big difference in the rotors with holes cast into them and blank rotors with holes drilled into them by some guy on ebay.
 
I never liked the idea of "Racers use it so it has to be good." argument. Race teams are out to advertise products to get people to buy them, they don't necessarily use something because of performance.

Going to have to disagree with this, race teams dont use crappy equipment just to sell it to you. They still want to win races, and arent going to put some junk on their race car for a some extra sponsorship cash.
 
Sorry about my misinformation. That article helps make sense of it all. I will now go hide under a rock some where and wait to die.
 
Going to have to disagree with this, race teams dont use crappy equipment just to sell it to you. They still want to win races, and arent going to put some junk on their race car for a some extra sponsorship cash.

Well it has to be a balancing act for sure. You can't use junk parts and hope to do well enough to compete and sell products. You can't tell me every part on a race car is there 100% for performance and not a product placement at all.

Using drilled rotors may not gain them anything but doesn't cost them enough performance to hurt them either but sure helps to sell a lot.

I would also look at a car and see all the stickers as junk put there for extra cash.
 
Before the argument is made that modern supercars use rotors with holes in them comes up. There is a big difference in the rotors with holes cast into them and blank rotors with holes drilled into them by some guy on ebay.
x2 Many of the cross drilled rotors you see stock on performance vehicles are cast that way. I have used a few different cross drilled rotors on various cars. Brembo, Stillen, and Porterfield Performance Cyro'd rotors are some of the more popular ones. All of the had chamfered holes, which was suppose to help with the cracking as well. While they looked nice they all developed cracks around the holes (dangerous), the holes rusted, some closed with rust, and when run through mud held dirt. As a result of some of the previous issues, before the rotors were swapped out, the braked developed a slight rumble when braking. Going back to the "because racecar" argument, a race vehicle's rotors will never see that mileage on their rotors before they are swapped out. Google "cross drilled rotor crack" and you will see what I am talking about. Also, a bit more info on drilled rotors: http://www.pfyc.com/GN4005.html I'm staying with slotted or plain.

Race teams don't use any part that a manufacturer gives them. They are looking for the best performance. Just because their vehicle has a manufacturer's sticker on it doesn't mean they use a part from them. In terms of brakes you don't necessarily want parts that is is used on a race vehicle. The pads are meant to run very hot and stay hot. That is when they perform the best. They don't work well when cold and would be dangerous on a street driven vehicle because the pads won't get up to operating temp and grab correctly.
 
My $.02:
Akebono Pro-ACT ceramic pads + PBR rotors have treated my XJ very well. I haven't had the guts to try and really lock up the 31s but they are quiet, low dusting & the jeep stops better than most people expect it to. My next brake set will come from Black Magic, I think, but ceramics *can* be damned good.
Stick with a quality solid rotor and call it a day.
 
I have to disagree with the mass vs cooling argument, if this were true, a single core radiator would be the most effective. The holes significantly increase the surface area and will cool better. Not to mention, the large mass will heat up slower, but will also hold heat longer. Basic thermodynamics.
 
The holes significantly increase the surface area and will cool better. Not to mention, the large mass will heat up slower, but will also hold heat longer. Basic thermodynamics.

What the? Today must be opposite day.

Two given objects that are the same size dimensionally have the same surface area. Drill holes in one, and you take away a portion of that total surface area. Basic geometry. You can't talk about mass and area like they are the same thing. One is a dimension, one is a weight.

The argument about radiators is irrelevant. A dual core radiator is usually more effective because you can cram more surface area in a small space. The second or third row is receiving air, yes. But it's air that has already picked up heat from the first row. Not to mention the tubes are significantly smaller. Ever seen racecar radiators? Most are stupidly thick, stupidly big, all aluminum single core.
 
The holes significantly increase the surface area? Not really. Only the thickness of the rotor times the circumference of the hole times the number of holes times two (for each side of the rotor). Not to mention the rotors are already vented.

And how would a single core radiator be more effective according to the "mass vs cooling" argument?
 
Back
Top