How OJ "would" have killed nicole

[87manche]

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,229504,00.html

[Lawn Cher']

That guy has really figured out how to work the system. He's slicker than Clinton. Bastard.

[87manche]

oh I'm tivoing this, I gotta see it.

[boise49ers]

That guy has really figured out how to work the system. He's slicker than Clinton. Bastard.
With that statement I'm assuming your Avartar is a portrait of
yourself:roflmao: I agree OJ is a dirt bag, but Slick Willy has 10x the brain power your little buddy:looser: does. I'm sure you know who I'm talking about. I'd put his lies up there or even surpassing Willy's. Willy's never caused a death.
Personally I can't watch OJ. You can tell he is lying just by watching him.

[casm]

Willy's never caused a death.

Excuse me?

Much like every president before and after him, the man was both the President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief of the United States Armed Forces - a position that he held for eight years, if I remember correctly. If I also remember correctly, he sent our soldiers to numerous military engagements in that time - Somalia, Bosnia, and other clusterf***s that we really should have been letting the UN thin out their numbers in. I also seem to remember that some of our soldiers never made it back from those engagements.

Since my memory is kinda fuzzy on the finer details of this point, I'm letting the Internet handle that for me. This link (http://www.cdi.org/issues/USForces/deployments.html) details U.S. military engagements during the term of his presidency and others. Saying that he "never caused a death" is both ignorant and inaccurate.

I would strongly recommend reading the book 'Because He Could (http://www.amazon.com/Because-He-Could-Dick-Morris/dp/B0009K75U4/sr=1-1/qid=1163619536/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-0040405-2733473?ie=UTF8&s=books)' by Dick Morris and Eileen McGann; it's rather good at shattering the myth of Saint Willy.

[boise49ers]

Excuse me?

Much like every president before and after him, the man was both the President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief of the United States Armed Forces - a position that he held for eight years, if I remember correctly. If I also remember correctly, he sent our soldiers to numerous military engagements in that time - Somalia, Bosnia, and other clusterf***s that we really should have been letting the UN thin out their numbers in. I also seem to remember that some of our soldiers never made it back from those engagements.

Since my memory is kinda fuzzy on the finer details of this point, I'm letting the Internet handle that for me. This link (http://www.cdi.org/issues/USForces/deployments.html) details U.S. military engagements during the term of his presidency and others. Saying that he "never caused a death" is both ignorant and inaccurate.

I would strongly recommend reading the book 'Because He Could (http://www.amazon.com/Because-He-Could-Dick-Morris/dp/B0009K75U4/sr=1-1/qid=1163619536/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-0040405-2733473?ie=UTF8&s=books)' by Dick Morris and Eileen McGann; it's rather good at shattering the myth of Saint Willy.

We can all read and recommend a book. Whether it is true or not is another thing. How do we know ? Do you believe all the alligations that come out of Iraq and Afghanstan ? It is selective choosing. We all do it. We believe what we want to believe and don't what we don't want to believe. I choose to believe the whole war was propagated on lies and will end the same way. I hate that our troops have to fight and die for lies. They say fight them there or fight them here. Think about that for a minute. If the DHLS is doing what we are spending billions on then it shouldn't happen, but if it does do you really think because we are occupying Iraq it isn't going to happen ?
Why wouldn't it ? Why would Iraq occupation prevent it ? I just don't understand the mind set at all. I think Afghanstan is justified, Get the f**kers who flew the planes into the WTC. Why Iraq though ? What gets me now is the same people who a few years ago before the War started were saying just nuke them are now on the band wagon saying we need to stick around and help the poor Iraqis. Well make up your minds, do we nuke them or save them. Can't have it both ways.
Just my worthless Opinion as always when we have these discussions. :patriot:

[casm]

We can all read and recommend a book. Whether it is true or not is another thing. How do we know ?

Fair point, but the book was only recommended reading. My argument above was based on historical fact.

Do you believe all the alligations that come out of Iraq and Afghanstan ? It is selective choosing. We all do it. We believe what we want to believe and don't what we don't want to believe. I choose to believe the whole war was propagated on lies and will end the same way. I hate that our troops have to fight and die for lies.

Sure, and you're absolutely entitled to believe that. I happen to disagree with your point of view based, again, on historical fact.

They say fight them there or fight them here. Think about that for a minute. If the DHLS is doing what we are spending billions on then it shouldn't happen, but if it does do you really think because we are occupying Iraq it isn't going to happen ?

I think you're confusing two separate issues here. The war on terrorism (a term I personally don't like, but we'll go with it) and the war in Iraq are not the same thing, though there are likely some interrelationships between them. Remember that Iraq sprang from a multinational accord on enforcement of WMD sanctions; Afghanistan was a direct response to the September 11th attacks. One thing I will say, however: I would much rather fight them there than here.

Why wouldn't it ? Why would Iraq occupation prevent it ? I just don't understand the mind set at all. I think Afghanstan is justified, Get the f**kers who flew the planes into the WTC. Why Iraq though ? What gets me now is the same people who a few years ago before the War started were saying just nuke them are now on the band wagon saying we need to stick around and help the poor Iraqis. Well make up your minds, do we nuke them or save them. Can't have it both ways.

Remember, though, that September 11th happened because the US was perceived as weak (and with some reasonable justification) - a situation that had been brought about courtesy of the policies of the Clinton administration. I don't believe that it happened for any other reason than we were not expected to retaliate as we did.

:patriot:

With ya on that one :)

[5-90]

Willy's never caused a death.

Might I suggest you ask Vince Foster, if you can organise a seance?

Sure - Vinny was a suicide. A suicide in which carpet fibres were found all over him, but no grass (and he was found in a park.) In which blood clearly flowed uphill to leave a spoor trail. I could probably go on, but those two simple facts are enough to blow the whole "suicide" theory away...

As far as Clinton deploying troops under UN command hither and yon - most of his deployments were in excess of stated manning levels as specified in treaty with the UN (read: we didn't need to send anybody else,) and since it was commonly junior officers on down being chopped to UN command, under foreign leadership, these deployments were also clearly a violation of contract and the Oath of Enlistment that every individual in uniform takes - literally speaking, they didn't have to go, and could have sued C-in-C for breach of contract. It's just too bad that only SP4 Michael G. New got the idea - if more people had done something, I wonder how things would have been different...

5-90

[lost1]

yeah this oughta be an interesting interview.

[Blaine B.]

Haha, they should say......Why'd you change up your origional plan that you carried through with and succeeded with perfectly?

[kubtastic]

Do you believe all the alligations that come out of Iraq and Afghanstan ?
http://www.brynosaurus.com/funny/alligator/alligator.gif
Nah.

I don't respect the guy who flew into Rwanda for an afternoon to be compassionate about the deaths of 100's of thousands of people.

[w_howey]

I would figure OJ would just do it the same way again....

[red91]

Willy's never caused a death. [/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]


Tell that one to Vince Foster...or better yet they young girl Willy got pregnant in I believe the late 70's that had a little "accident".

Google "Bill Clinton and mysterious deaths"....too many to be a conincidence.

Food for thought.

[Powerman]

Remember, though, that September 11th happened because the US was perceived as weak (and with some reasonable justification) - a situation that had been brought about courtesy of the policies of the Clinton administration. I don't believe that it happened for any other reason than we were not expected to retaliate as we did.


Um, you might want to reconsider your opinion. 9-11 happened because Bin Laden wanted to pick a fight with the U.S. He gained a lot of power and financing from "beating" the U.S.S.R. He wanted to continue playing hero, saviour, God, leader or whatever he wants to call it. He could not invade the U.S. so he needed the U.S. to come to him. 9-11 was for the sole purpose of bring a war with the U.S. to the mountains of Afghanistan. I don't know any books to read, or what the historical facts are. I just listen to the tapes of his speeches and listen to the words that come out of his mouth. If you disagree, take it up with Bin Laden. He is in the mountains of Afghanistan.

Oh and if you want to blame some of this idiots actions on Clinton, why stop there? Actually, this whole mess can be blamed on Regan. He is the one that gave weapons and supplies to the Afghan rebles to beat the other Superpower we were in a cold war with. The war that gave Bin Laden his rise to power. Actually, we need to blame Carter. He is the one that authorized the CIA to provoke a response from the Soviets into entering the war. Oh, wait a minute, actually this whole mess is Eisenhower's fault, he started the Cold War.....How about we blame it on the one individual that took credit for it, Bin Laden. Now if OJ could just do the same, that would be great.